Focus movie Robert Dilts read. Focus movie (Robert Dilts). How to work with movie tricks

For the remaining two dozen rocks. It is necessary to provide a systematic description of the main learning patterns that will help people create new transformations and changes already existing ones, with real practice and various rights for mastering the learned material.

The book is intended for practitioners of NLP and short-line psychotherapy, psychologists, healers, teachers, culturologists, top managers, and will also be useful to everyone who cares.

Peredmova

This is the book I was prepared to write about so many fates. Vaughn talks about the magic of language, based on the principles and implications of neuro-linguistic programming (NLP). I first had a chance to get involved with NLP about twenty-five years ago while studying linguistics at the University of California (Santa Cruz). This is the work of one of the creators of NLP, John Grinder. At that time, they and Richard Bandler had just completed the first volume of their main work, “The Structure of Magic” (The Structure of Magic, 1975). This book succeeded in modeling the mental patterns and intuitive commonalities of three of the world's most successful psychotherapists (Fritz Perls, Virginia Satyr and Milton Ericson). This set of patterns (known as a “meta-model”) allowed me, a third-year political science student who is not in need of practical knowledge in the field of psychotherapy, to set the same principles as a psychotherapist could set.

The scale of the metamodel's capabilities is the same process of modeling, having dealt with the greatness of the enemy. I feel that modeling can be widely used in all areas of human activity, including politics, literature, management, science and pedagogy (Modeling With NLP, Dilts, 1998). only in psychotherapy, but also in many other areas that deal with the process of communication, since at that time I was engaged in political philosophy, my first practical insight into the modeling of the problem of stagnation of language the original filters used by Grinder and Bandler when analyzing the work of psychotherapists, with the method vision of song patterns in Plato's Dialogues (Plato's Use of the Dialectic in The Republic: Linguistic Analysis, 1975; in Applications of NLP, Dilts, 1983).

The investigation turned out to be both fascinating and informative. Regardless, I realized that the gift of Socrates' reconception cannot be explained using a metamodel alone. There were also other phenomena described by NLP, such as predicates of the representational system (descriptive words that indicate a specific sensory modality: “see”, “wonder”, “hear”, “sound”, “see”, “stand” etc. ) P.). These particularities allowed the essence of Socrates' gift to be spoiled, otherwise they could hunt around all his dead.

I have continued to study the history of those who were able to follow the course of history - Jesus of Nazareth, Karl Marx, Abraham Lincoln, Albert Einstein, Mahatmi Gandhi, Martin Luther King and others. Years ago, I realized that all the people vikorized one basic set of parents, for the help of which they poured into the judgment of those who had left. Moreover, the patterns encoded in their words continued to flow into history and signify through the fates after the death of these people. The “Focus Movie” patterns are an attempt to decipher some of the most important linguistic mechanisms that helped these people convert others and integrate into the big idea and systems.

In 1980 During my conversation with one of the founders of NLP, Richard Bandler, I began to recognize these patterns and see their formal structure. At the hour of the seminar, Bandler, who masterfully volodizes me, presented us with a blindness, but also a paranoidly rigid system of reconversion and proponating to try to change the reconstitution (div. section 9). Regardless of all their efforts, the members of the group did not achieve the desired result: Bandler’s system turned out to be impregnable, as a result of what I later called “thought-viruses.”

I heard a lot of verbal “frames” that Bandler spontaneously created, and quickly discovered that the actors from these structures were less familiar. Irrespective of those who, for greater perversity, Bandler stagnated these patterns in the “negative” aspect, I know that such structures themselves were victorious by Lincoln, Gandhi, Jesus, etc., in order to receive positive and radical social Mine.

In essence, these patterns are formed from verbal categories and features, with the help of which our language allows us to shape, change or recreate the basic transformations of people. Patterns of “Focus Movies” can be characterized as new “verbal frames” that flow into the transformation and mental maps, on the basis of which the transformation will be based. In the two decades that have passed since their discovery, these patterns have earned the right to be called one of the most productive methods of effective transformation created by NLP, and, most likely, the most unique way of changing transformations in spilkuvan. no.

However, here we need to add complexes for learning, the fragments include words, and words are essentially abstract. NLP tends to appreciate that words are surface structures that represent and express underlying structures. In order to correctly understand and creatively formulate this pattern, it is necessary to grasp its “deep structure”. Otherwise, it is possible to avoid using different butts. Thus, when learning “Movie Tricks” and learning them in practice, it is necessary to separate the real magic and banal tricks. The magic of change comes from what lies behind the words.

And to this day, the beginning of these patterns will be to familiarize students with the meanings and verbal applications of various linguistic structures. Scientists are interested in the intuitive way of touching the deep structures necessary for the independent creation of patterns. Regardless of the fact that children begin to learn native languages ​​this way, this method imposes a number of restrictions.

For some people (especially since the English language is not native to them), the “Focus Language” programs, for all their effectiveness, may seem too complicated and foolish. However, practicing NLP practitioners with ample evidence have always made it clear how their partners use other NLP concepts.

These paterns are often used in polemics as a method of conducting discussion and providing proof. This gave them a reputation as a potentially powerful person.

These difficulties simply reflect the historical development of the patterns themselves. I have identified and formalized these patterns, first of all denying the ability to fully trace the underlying structures of the transition and change, as well as their connections with other levels of initiation and change. Since that time, I have been able to develop a whole range of low-tech re-conversion techniques, such as re-imprinting, the re-forming pattern at the gates, the installation of re-conversion, the “meta-mirror” and the integration of conflicting re-conversions (Chang ing Belief Systems with NLP 7 Dilts, 1990 l and Belief Health and Well-being, Dilts, Hallbom & Smith, 1990). And with the remaining fate, I will be able to clearly identify how transformations are formed and consolidated on the cognitive and nervous levels, in order to thoroughly and immediately describe the mental structures that are at the basis of “Movie Focus.”

The meta of the first book is to present the reader’s actions from my findings and criticisms, so that on their basis it is possible to develop the “Focus Movie” paterns. My mission was to reveal the principles and deep structures on which these patterns are based. In addition to the significance and applications, I want to give you simple structures that allow you to practice the skin of these mothers and illustrate how they work with other assumptions, principles, techniques and concepts of NLP.

I also plan to write another volume called “The Language of Leadership and Social Change.” We can see the types of practical stagnation of these principles by such people as Socrates, Jesus, Marx, Lincoln, Gandhi and others, who attempted to create, change and transform the key changes that lie at the basis of the modern world.

“Focus Movie” is the most important subject. Its power and value lie in the fact that with its help one can learn to say the right words at the right time - without the help of formal techniques or special contexts (which are traditionally associated with therapy and discourse iyami). I suspect that you are dissatisfied with the appreciation of the magic of language and verbal methods of change.

Robert Dilts,

Santa Cruz, California

MOVA I DOSVID

Magic movie

At the heart of Focus Movies lies the magical power of words. Language is one of the key components of our internal models of the world. It is important to focus on how we perceive reality and respond to it. The gift of language is a unique gift for people. It is accepted to take into account that this is one of the main factors that have changed the vision of people from other living sources. The eminent psychiatrist Sigmund Freud, for example, respected what is the basic instrument of human intelligence and, being such, is endowed with a special power. Vin wrote:

Words and magic were one from the beginning, and nowadays most of the magical power of words has not been wasted. For additional help, a person can give someone else the greatest happiness or throw it away at the end; For help, the teacher passes on his academic knowledge; The speaker will follow the audience behind him, which means judgment and decision. Words evoke emotions and spirit in particular, for the help we pour into our neighbors.

The “Focus Language” patterns were created as a result of investigating the ways in which vicarious language allows us to connect with other people. Let's point out a number of butts:

A female police officer takes a terminological cry to one of the booths of her plot before family welding with elements of violence. Vaughn is alarmed, because she knows that in such situations her health is exposed to the greatest danger - no one, especially people who are prone to violence and burning anger, should not be treated if the police are involved in her Check with your family. Arriving at the alarm, the police officer hears the loud cry of a man, the characteristic sounds of objects breaking, and the loud screams of a woman. The TV flickers out of the window and crashes right in front of the policeman’s feet. She runs up to the door and with all her strength comes into it. In the middle of the valley comes the voice of a distraught man: “Who the hell has he brought there?” The woman’s gaze falls on the remains of a broken TV, and she blurts out: “Master from the television studio.” There is a dead silence in the house, and then the man begins to laugh. The doors are opened, and now the policeman can safely go to the booth without fear of any violence. Over the years, it seemed that these few words helped her no less, for months they trained in hand-to-hand combat.

A young man who insists that he is Jesus Christ goes to a psychiatric clinic. All day long he hangs around the ward with nothing to do and reads sermons to other patients who are not dying for the same thirst for respect. Doctors and staff will not be able to change the mind of the young man under their illusion. It looks like a new psychiatrist is coming to the clinic. Having watched the patient, you are tempted to talk to him. “As far as I understand, you have evidence from the Tesla authorities?” - like a doctor. “Well... I guess so...” – the patient confirms. The psychiatrist explains to him that there will be a new room in the clinic, and for which a person who has skills as a carpenter is needed. “We would be more than willing to help you,” like a doctor, “to understand that you belong to the type of people who should help others.” Unable to be convinced, the patient accepts the proposition. Participation in the project helps me interact with other patients and workers and learn how to interact normally with people. This year, the young man leaves the clinic and settles for permanent work.

The woman will come to you in the postoperative ward of the hospital. This is led by a surgeon. Still weak from anesthesia, the woman anxiously asks about how the operation went. The surgeon says: “I’m afraid that I have some bad news for you. Pukhlina, as we saw, was evil.” The woman, whose worst fears have been confirmed, asks: “What now?”, to which the doctor replies: “Well, that’s good news: we have seen the chubby lining of the table as carefully as possible... And the decision is to lie with you " Prompted by the words “I decide to stay with you,” the woman seriously thinks about her way of living and possible alternatives, changes her diet, and begins to exercise regularly. Having realized how dysfunctional and stressful her life was in the years before the operation, she stands on the path of a special development, meaning for herself a reconsideration of the values ​​and sense of life. Just go to get better, and after a few rocks the woman feels happy, free from cancer and healthy as never before.

A young woman is driving a car on a wet winter road. He turns around after the evening, having drunk a lot of wine. At one of the turns in front of him, a person incompetently hesitates to cross the road. When the water presses on the surface, the car is skidded and the footfall sinks under the wheels. For a long hour after this, the young man cannot recover, paralyzed by emotional experiences. He knows that having saved a person’s life and saved his family’s wrongful harm. We understand that the unfortunate incident was due to our fault: if we hadn’t drunk too much, we would have walked earlier and reacted more adequately. Sinking deeper and deeper into depression, the young woman is threatening to end her life by self-destruction. At this hour, my uncle is coming to visit. Bachachi greeted his nephew, sat with his hand on his shoulder for an hour, and then, putting his hands on his shoulders, said the simple and truthful words: “No matter what we were doing, we were still on the brink of failure.” And the young man feels that some kind of enlightenment has appeared in his life. He completely changes his way of living, begins to study psychology and becomes a therapist-consultant to deal with the unfortunate victims of drunken drinking, alcoholics and people arrested for drunken drinking. Wealthy clients are given the opportunity to gain wealth and enjoy their lives.

The girl is planning to go to college. Out of all possible options, she would like to apply to a business school at one of the most prestigious universities in the area. This competition seems so great that she has no chance of being accepted. After “really marveling at the speech” and being disappointed, she plans to submit documents to one of the “easier” schools. After filling out the application form, the girl explains her choice to her mother: “I’m convinced that the university will simply fill up the application.” At this point, the mother says: “For a good person, there will be a place again.” The unseen truth of these words inspires the girl to apply to a prestigious university. Upon her discovery, she was accepted and went on to become a highly successful business consultant.

The boy is trying to learn how to play baseball. She wants to join the same team as her friends, but she can’t throw or catch and is afraid of the ball. The more you train, the more you lose heart. Vin informs the coach about those who may be planning to leave the sport, because they have turned out to be “filthy gravers.” The coach says: “There are no bad people, there are just those who are not good at their jobs.” He stands opposite the boy and hands him the ball so that he can pass the ball back. Then the coach goes one step at a time and lightly throws the ball at the graver’s mitt, turning the pass with a flicker. Step by step, the coach goes further and further until the boy sees that he can easily throw and receive the ball on a high stand. With seemingly ease, the boy turns around before training and eventually becomes a leader, valuable to his team.

All these applications have one thing in common: very few people can change their lives for a better life due to the fact that in their interconnections there is a destruction of prospects with a great number of alternatives. In these cases, it is important that the right words, spoken at the right moment, can produce significant positive results.

Unfortunately, words not only empower us, but also lead us into deception and limit our capabilities. Wrong words, spoken at the wrong time, can cause great harm and pain.

This book talks about the harm and harm of words, about those who can determine the effect that your words have, as well as about the principles that allow you to reverse the wrong decisions on the earth. The term “sleight of mouth” emphasizes the similarity of these patterns to card tricks. The word sleight itself is similar to an old Scandinavian word that means “sweet,” “cunning,” “rightful,” or “sweet.” The phrase sleight of hand in English means a type of card trick that can be characterized by the phrase: “the axis is your card, and the axis is no longer there.” For example, you cover the deck with an ace of spades, but if the magician takes the card, the ace of spades turns into a queen of hearts. The verbal patterns of “Focus Movies” are similar to “magical” authorities, and they often cause daily changes and quiet ones, on which the conflict is based.

Language and neuro-linguistic programming

This research is based on patterns and concepts that are seen in neurolinguistic programming (NLP). NLP deals with the problem of influx, which encourages language to program mental processes and other functions of the nervous system, and also learns how mental processes and the nervous system shape our language and mental patterns and recognize their patterns.

The essence of neuro-linguistic programming is that the functioning of the nervous system (“neuro-”) is closely related to human abilities (“linguistic”). The strategies (“programs”), with the help of which we organize and directly our behavior, are formed from nervous and mental patterns. In their first book, “The Structure of Magic” (1975), the founders of NLP, Richard Bandler and John Grinder, tried to identify certain principles on which Freud’s “magic” is based:

All the merits of people, both positive and negative, depend on the respect of the local language. Being human, we learn language in two ways. First of all, with the help of this, we create our own evidence - this type of activity we call mirkuvanny, myslenny, fantasizing, retelling. If we use language as a representative system, we create a model of our knowledge. This model of the world, created for the additional representative function of the language, is based on our common world. Our enemies are also often indicated by our model of representation... In another way, we use the language in order to convey our model, or representation, to one world. We are called ceremonies, discussions, writings, giving lectures, singing.

According to Bandler and Grinder, language can serve as a means of representation, and the creation of models of our knowledge, as well as the way of their transmission. Apparently, the ancient Greeks used different words to designate these two functions of language. The term “rheme” means words associated with meanings and meanings. The concept of “rheme” came before words, like “words as objects,” and the concept of “logos” came before the words connected with the “visible mind.” The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle described the relationship between words and mental evidence this way:

The words spoken mean the wisdom of the mind, the words written mean the words spoken. Just as the handwriting of different people is visible, so are the sounds of their proclamations. However, the intellectual truth that words signify is the same for everyone, just like those objects, from the images of which wines are formed.

Aristotle’s insistence that words “signify” our “intellectual evidence” is consistent with the position of NLP in that written and spoken words are “superficial structures”, which, in their own way, are the transformation of mental and linguistic “globes” Binny structures". As a result, words can instantly form and shape mental evidence. This is the power to work against their constant thoughts and other known and unknown mental processes. Penetrating levels of deep structures with the help of specific words, determined by the individual, we can identify and carry out those mental processes that identify our own pattern in the natural patterns of this person.

From this point of view, language is not just an “epiphenomenon” but a set of significant signs that we inform others of our mental awareness; This is the most important storehouse of our mental satisfaction. How to say Bandler and Grinder:

The nervous system, which is responsible for the creation of the representative system of language, is the same nervous system with the help of which people create all other models of the world - visual, kinesthetic, etc. These systems have their own structural principles.

In this way, language can duplicate and even replace our evidence and our activity in other internal representative systems. It is important to realize that the “conversation” does not simply reflect our statements about the current situation, but rather creates new changes and changes that are unnecessary, since language plays a potentially deep and specific role in the processes of life change and healing.

For example, in the philosophy of the ancient Greeks, the concept of “logos” contained a supporting and unifying principle of all-worldliness. Heraclitus (540-480 RR) defined “logos” as “a universal principle, by means of which all speech is connected with one another and all aspects of nature are formed.” The Stoics called “logos” a powerful or cosmic principle that is powerful and powerful throughout reality and permeates it. According to the Judeo-Hellenistic philosopher Philo (partner of Jesus Christ), “logos” is a mediator between absolute reality and sensitive light.

Map and territory

The cornerstone of “Focus Language” and the approach to language adopted in NLP is the statement that “the map is not the same as the territory.” This principle was first formulated by the founder of legal semantics, Alfred Korzybski (1879-1950). It depicts the fundamental differences between our maps of the world and the world itself. Korzybski's philosophy has had a strong influence on the development of NLP. Korzybski’s work in the field of semantics, together with the syntactic theory of transformational grammar of Naum Chomsky, establishes the core of the “linguistic” aspect of neuro-linguistic programming.

In his main work Science and Sanity (1933), Korzybski comes up with the idea that the progress of our marriage is, in the smallest world of ideas, evident in people with a weak nervous system, which creates and is symbolic both representations and maps. The language, for example, is also a different kind of map and model of the world, which allows us to understand and consolidate our evidence and pass it on to others, thereby demonstrating their need to make the same arrangements or re-read take note of what has already been found. According to Korzybski’s assertions, this very fact, up to date, explains the progress of people in equalizing with creatures, the failure of the common people and the adoption of similar mechanisms is the reason for the absence of problems. I assume that a person must understand how to correctly understand mine, and for this purpose one can avoid unnecessary conflicts and inconsistencies that may arise from confusion between the map and the territory.

Zokrema, “the law of individuality” Kozhibski says that “there are no two identical people, either by situation or by the stages of a process.” Kozhibsky noted that the sum of our unique evidence vastly outweighs the supply of words and to understand, and not to lead to attempts to identify or “confuse” two or more situations (those that in NLP rejected the name “concealed” or “two” significance"). The word "whale", for example, is used in relation to millions of different individuals of this species, to one and the same creature at different periods of life, to our obvious images, illustrations and photographs, metaphorically - according to Referred to as a human (“another whale” "), І navіt until the letters k-o-t. In such a manner, if anyone mentions the word “kit”, it is not immediately obvious that he has a creature in his sights, which is to say, a triliteral word, or a two-legged human-like creature.

According to Kozybski, it is extremely important to teach people to understand and expand their capabilities in order to achieve greater success in their lives and to properly appreciate the uniqueness of everyday experiences. We have created tools that would help people evaluate their evidence, focusing not so much on traditional meanings, but rather on unique facts that are relevant to each specific situation. Kozhibski was careful to ensure that people did not rush into over-the-top reactions and paid attention to the unique power of the individual situation and alternative interpretations.

The ideas and methods of Kozhibski are one of the “pillars” on which NLP is based. Born in 1941 Kozhibski first called “neurolinguistics” an important branch of scientific inquiry associated with obscure semantics.

NLP takes into account that our skin has a powerful picture of the world, based on internal “maps of the world”, which are formed with the help of the language and sensory representational systems as a result of our daily knowledge. The male “neurolingvіstichnі” was a picture of the bail, nіzh herself is the same, they are in charge of those, yak mi іnterpret, that react in the hobby, yaki sensation of our behaviy. As Shakespeare’s Hamlet said, “There is nothing good or bad; I don’t think about letting everything go like this.”

In the book “The Structure of Magic” (Volume I), Bandler and Grinder point out the differences between people, how they respond effectively and ineffectively to excessive light, and a significant function of theirs. internal light models:

People who react creatively and effectively cope with their difficulties... are those who provide a new representation or model of a power situation, within the framework of which, at the moment of praise, the decision to stink reveals a wide range of possibilities. Others perceive themselves as quiet, who have little capacity, and nothing is profitable for them... We have discovered that too much light is not limited or reduced by alternatives. But people close their eyes on the basis of their capabilities, which are inaccessible to the world in their models.

Kozhibski has discovered a difference between the map and the territory, which means that our developments are identified rather by internal models of reality, rather than by reality. Therefore, it is necessary to gradually expand our maps of the world. In the words of the great scientist Albert Einstein, “our mind creates problems that are impossible to solve with the help of a mind of the same type.”

NLP asserts that if you get rich or expand your map, then in the same reality you will have more alternatives. By all means, you will become wise and successful in everything you do without being timid. The primary method of NLP is the creation of tools (such as the “Focus Language” paterns) that would help people expand, gain wealth and supplement their internal maps of action. NLP appreciates that the richer your “map of the world” is, the more opportunities you have to face the reality of any kind of misfortune.

According to NLP, there is no single “true” or “correct” map of the world. Each of us has a unique map, because the model, light, and the same map do not reflect the reality “more correctly,” or “correctly,” otherwise. The truth is that those of us who successfully cope with our problems draw a “map of the world” that allows them to have a large number of prospects and choices. Such people perceive light richer and more widely, organize it and respond to it.

Dosvid

Our “maps of the world” can be exposed to sensory evidence, so that the process of experiencing and experiencing the light around us, as well as our internal reactions to this world, can be seen. Our “evidence” about the sunset, the super river, or the release of the sun leads to a special understanding and participation in this process. NLP is accustomed to respecting the fact that information is formed in order to come from the outer edge and take advantage of the relevant sensory organs, as well as associative guesses, fantasies, feelings and emotions. Oh, what lies in the middle of us.

The term “confirmation” is also being used according to the accumulated knowledge of our life. The information that has passed through the organs is gradually encoded, or “packed”, with the help of already obvious knowledge. Thus, our testimony is the truth with which we create powerful maps or models of the world.

Sensory evidence is information received through the sense organs (eyes, ears, skin, nose and mouth), as well as knowledge about the external world, which gives rise to this information. The organs are sensitive devices, for the help of which people and other creatures receive excessive light. The skin sensory channel functions as a kind of filter that reacts to a wide range of stimuli (light and sound, physical contact, etc.) and has its own characteristics depending on the type of these subjects.

By ensuring the first contact with too much light, the organs are sensitive to their own “windows in the light.” All information about our physical life passes through them. Therefore, NLP places great importance on sensory input and appreciates that for a person, the primary source of knowledge about the world is the main source of material for creating models of the world. Successful learning, fusion and modeling are based on sensory evidence.

Sensory awareness can be contrasted with other forms of awareness, such as fantasies and hallucinations, which are both produced by the human brain and less perceived by the sensory organs. In addition to the information received from other sensitive organs, people have an information system that consists of information generated by the inner light, such as “thoughts”, “conversion”, “values”, “self-esteem”. This internal system of knowledge creates a set of “internal” filters that concentrate and direct our senses (as well as lower, reverse and direct the signals that pass through the sense organs).

Sensory information is the first way to capture new information about a child to expand our “maps of the world.” Often, filters of already formed knowledge reveal new and potentially significant sensory information. One of the missions of NLP is to help people learn to accept greater sensory information as an extension of what Aldous Huxley called the “lower valve” of information. The founders of NLP, John Grinder and Richard Bandler, constantly emphasized in their teachings the need for “sensory input” in the absence of mental planning, or “halucinations.”

Robert Dilts

Focus movie. Change your mind for more NLP help

Peredmova

This is the book I was prepared to write about so many fates. Vaughn talks about the magic of language, based on the principles and implications of neuro-linguistic programming (NLP). I first had a chance to get involved with NLP about twenty-five years ago while studying linguistics at the University of California (Santa Cruz). This is the work of one of the creators of NLP, John Grinder. At that time, Richard Bandler had just finished the first volume of his main work, “The Structure of Magic.” This book succeeded in modeling the mental patterns and intuitive commonalities of three of the world's most successful psychotherapists (Fritz Perls, Virginia Satyr and Milton Ericson). This set of patterns (known as a “meta-model”) allowed me, a third-year political science student who is not in need of practical knowledge in the field of psychotherapy, to set the same principles as a psychotherapist could set.

The scale of the metamodel's capabilities is the same process of modeling, having dealt with the greatness of the enemy. I feel that modeling can be widely applied to all spheres of human activity, whether politics, literature, management, science or pedagogy ( Modeling With NLP Dilts, 1998). The rise of these techniques, in my opinion, could lead to significant changes in psychotherapy, and in many other areas that involve the process of communication. Since I have been engaged in political philosophy, my first practical proof of modeling came from trying to establish linguistic filters, as used by Grinder and Bandler when analyzing the work of psychotherapists, using the method of seeing song patterns in Plato's Dialogues.

The investigation turned out to be both fascinating and informative. Regardless, I realized that the gift of Socrates’ reconception cannot be explained using a metamodel alone. There were also other phenomena described by NLP, such as predicates of the representational system (descriptive words that indicate a specific sensory modality: “see”, “wonder”, “hear”, “sound”, “see”, “stand” etc. ) P.). These particularities allowed the essence of Socrates' gift to be spoiled, otherwise they could hunt around all his dead.

I have continued to honor the legacy of those who were able to follow the course of history - Jesus of Nazareth, Karl Marx, Abraham Lincoln, Albert Einstein, Mahatmi Gandhi, Martin Luther King and others. Years ago, I realized that all the people vikorized one basic set of parents, for the help of which they poured into the judgment of those who had left. Moreover, the patterns encoded in their words continued to flow into history and signify through the fates after the death of these people. The “Focus Movie” patterns are an attempt to decipher some of the most important linguistic mechanisms that helped these people convert others and integrate into the big idea and systems.

In 1980 During my conversation with one of the founders of NLP, Richard Bandler, I began to recognize these patterns and see their formal structure. At the hour of the seminar, Bandler, who masterfully volodizes me, presented us with a blindness, but also a paranoidly rigid system of reconversion and proponating to try to change the reconstitution (div. section 9). Regardless of all their efforts, the members of the group did not achieve the desired result: Bandler’s system turned out to be impregnable, as a result of what I later called “thought-viruses.”

I heard a lot of verbal “frames” that Bandler spontaneously created, and quickly discovered that the actors from these structures were less familiar. Irrespective of those who, for greater perversity, Bandler stagnated these patterns in the “negative” aspect, I know that such structures themselves were victorious by Lincoln, Gandhi, Jesus, etc., in order to receive positive and radical social Mine.

In essence, these patterns are formed from verbal categories and features, with the help of which our language allows us to shape, change or recreate the basic transformations of people. Patterns of “Focus Movies” can be characterized as new “verbal frames” that flow into the transformation and mental maps, on the basis of which the transformation will be based. In the two decades that have passed since their discovery, these patterns have earned the right to be called one of the most productive methods of effective transformation created by NLP, and, most likely, the most unique way of changing transformations in spilkuvan. no.

However, here we need to add complexes for learning, the fragments include words, and words are essentially abstract. NLP tends to take into account what words are surface structures, what to imagine or turn clay structures. In order to correctly understand and creatively formulate this pattern, it is necessary to grasp its “deep structure”. Otherwise, it is possible to avoid using different butts. Thus, having started studying “Focus Movies” and studying them in practice, it is necessary to separate the information magic and banal tricks. The magic of change comes from what lies behind the words.

And to this day, the beginning of these patterns will be to familiarize students with the meanings and verbal applications of various linguistic structures. Scientists are interested in the intuitive way of touching the deep structures necessary for the independent creation of patterns. Regardless of the fact that children start doing the same thing, this method imposes a number of limitations.

For some people (especially since English language is not native to them), the “Focus Language” programs, for all their effectiveness, may seem too complicated and foolish. However, practicing NLP practitioners with ample evidence have always made it clear how their partners use other NLP concepts.

These paterns are often used in polemics as a method of conducting discussion and providing proof. This gave them a reputation as a potentially powerful person.

These difficulties simply reflect the historical development of the patterns themselves. I have identified and formalized these patterns, first of all denying the ability to fully trace the underlying structures of the transition and change, as well as their connections with other levels of initiation and change. Since that time, I have been able to develop a whole series of techniques for changing the connections, such as re-imprinting, the pattern of re-creation at the gates, the method of installation of re-conversion, the “meta-mirror” and the integration of conflicting transitions ( Changing Belief Systems with NLP, Dilts, 1990 Beliefs: Pathways to Health and Well-being, Dilts, Hallbom & Smith, 1990). And with the remaining fate, I will be able to clearly identify how transformations are formed and consolidated on the cognitive and nervous levels, in order to thoroughly and immediately describe the mental structures that are at the basis of “Movie Focus.”

The meta of the first book is to present the reader’s actions from my findings and criticisms, so that on their basis it is possible to vikorize the “Focus Movies” paternity. My mission was to reveal the principles and deep structures on which these patterns are based. In addition to the significance and applications, I want to give you simple structures that allow you to practice the skin of these mothers and illustrate how they work with other assumptions, principles, techniques and concepts of NLP.

I also plan to write another volume under the title “The Word of Leadership and Social Change.” We can see the types of practical stagnation of these principles by such people as Socrates, Jesus, Marx, Lincoln, Gandhi and others, who attempted to create, change and transform the key changes that lie at the basis of the modern world.

“Focus Movie” is a great subject. Its power and value lie in the fact that with its help one can learn to say the right words at the right time - without the help of formal techniques or special contexts (which are traditionally associated with therapy and discourse iyami). I suspect that you are dissatisfied with the appreciation of the magic of language and verbal methods of change.

This book is forever dedicated to Richard Bandler, John Grinder, Milton Ericson and Gregor Bateson, who taught me the magic of language and language. « magic».

Robert Dilts, Santa Cruz, California

Full side: 2 (the book has 19 sides) [available reading lessons: 13 sides]

Map and territory

The cornerstone of “Focus Language” and the approach to language adopted in NLP is the statement that “the map is not the same as the territory.” This principle was first formulated by the founder of legal semantics, Alfred Korzybski (1879–1950). It depicts the fundamental differences between our maps of the world and the world itself. Korzybski's philosophy has had a strong influence on the development of NLP. Korzybski’s work in the field of semantics, together with the syntactic theory of transformational grammar of Naum Chomsky, establishes the core of the “linguistic” aspect of neuro-linguistic programming.

At your own head Science and Sanity(1933) Kozhibski puts forward a thought about the fact that the progress of our marriage is due to the small world of understanding that people have a weak nervous system, creating and creating symbolic representations and maps. The language, for example, is also a different kind of map and model of the world, which allows us to understand and consolidate our evidence and pass it on to others, thereby demonstrating their need to make the same arrangements or re-read take note of what has already been found. According to Korzybski’s assertions, this very fact, up to date, explains the progress of people in equalizing with creatures, the failure of the common people and the adoption of similar mechanisms is the reason for the absence of problems. I assume that a person must understand how to correctly understand mine, and for this purpose one can avoid unnecessary conflicts and inconsistencies that may arise from confusion between the map and the territory.

Zokrema, “the law of individuality” Kozhibski says that “there are no two identical people, either by situation or by the stages of a process.” Kozhibski noted that the sum of our unique evidence vastly outweighs the supply of words and understanding and does not lead to attempts to identify or “confuse” two or more situations (those that in NLP rejected the name “concealed” and “two significance"). The word “whale”, for example, is used in relation to millions of different individuals of this species, to one and the same creature at different periods of life, to our obvious images, illustrations and photographs, metaphorically - according to Referred to as a human (“another whale” ") and say until the letters k-o-t are added. In such a manner, if anyone mentions the word “kit”, it is not immediately obvious that he has a creature in his sights, which is to say, a triliteral word, or a two-legged human-like creature.

According to Kozybski, it is extremely important to teach people to understand and expand their capabilities in order to achieve greater success in their lives and to properly appreciate the uniqueness of everyday experiences. We have created tools that would help people evaluate their evidence, focusing not so much on traditional meanings, but rather on unique facts that are relevant to each specific situation. Kozhibski was careful to ensure that people did not rush into over-the-top reactions and paid attention to the unique power of the individual situation and alternative interpretations.

The ideas and methods of Kozhibski are one of the “pillars” on which NLP is based. Born in 1941 Kozhibski first called “neurolinguistics” an important branch of scientific inquiry associated with obscure semantics.

NLP takes into account that our skin has a powerful picture of the world, based on internal “maps of the world”, which are formed with the help of the language and sensory representational systems as a result of our daily knowledge. The male “neurolingvіstichnі” was a picture of the bail, nіzh herself is the same, they are in charge of those, yak mi іnterpret, that react in the hobby, yaki sensation of our behaviy. As Shakespeare’s Hamlet said, “There is nothing good or bad; There’s no point in making everything look like this.” 3
Translation by M. L. Lozinsky. - M.: "Children's Literature", 1965.

In the book “The Structure of Magic” (Volume I), Bandler and Grinder point out the differences between people, how they respond effectively and ineffectively to excessive light, and a significant function of theirs. internal light models:

People who react creatively and effectively cope with their difficulties... are those who provide a new representation or model of a power situation, within the framework of which, at the moment of praise, the decision of the stench reveals a wide range of possibilities. Others perceive themselves as quiet, who have little capacity, and nothing is profitable for them... We have discovered that too much light is not limited or reduced by alternatives. But people close their eyes on the basis of their capabilities, which are inaccessible to the world in their models.

Kozhibski has discovered a difference between the map and the territory, which means that our developments are identified rather by internal models of reality, rather than by reality. Therefore, it is necessary to gradually expand our maps of the world. In the words of the great scientist Albert Einstein, “our mind creates problems that are impossible to solve with the help of a mind of the same type.”

NLP confirms that if you get rich or expand your map, you will have more alternatives in this very reality. By all means, you will become wise and successful in everything you do without being timid. The primary method of NLP is the creation of tools (such as the Focus Motion Patterns) that help people expand, gain wealth and complement their internal maps of action. NLP appreciates that the richer your “map of the world” is, the more opportunities you have to face the reality of any kind of misfortune.

From the perspective of NLP, there is no single “true” or “correct” map of the world. Each of us has a unique map, because the model, light, and the same map do not reflect the reality “more correctly,” or “correctly,” otherwise. What is clear is that those of us who are more successful in coping with our problems draw such a “map of the world” that allows them to have a large number of prospects and choices. Such people perceive light richer and more widely, organize it and respond to it.

Dosvid

Our “maps of the world” can be exposed to sensory evidence, so that the process of experiencing and experiencing the light around us, as well as our internal reactions to this world, can be seen. Our “evidence” about the sunset, the super river, or the release of the sun leads to a special understanding and participation in this process. NLP is accustomed to respecting the fact that information is formed in order to come from the outer edge and take advantage of the relevant sensory organs, as well as associative guesses, fantasies, feelings and emotions. Oh, what lies in the middle of us.

The term “confirmation” is also being used according to the accumulated knowledge of our life. The information that has passed through the organs is gradually encoded, or “packed”, with the help of already obvious knowledge. Thus, our testimony is the truth with which we create powerful maps or models of the world.

Sensory evidence This information is received through the senses (eyes, ears, skin, mouth), as well as knowledge about the external world, which gives rise to this information. Organs are sensitive devices for the help of which people and creatures receive excessive light. The skin sensory channel functions as a kind of filter that reacts to a wide range of stimuli (light and sound, physical contact, etc.) and has its own characteristics depending on the type of these subjects.

By ensuring the first contact with too much light, the organs are sensitive to the light. All information about our physical life passes through them. Therefore, NLP places great importance on sensory input and appreciates that for a person, the primary source of knowledge about the world is the main source of material for creating models of the world. On the sensory level, successful preparation, fusion and modeling are based.

Sensory awareness can be contrasted with other forms of awareness, such as fantasies and hallucinations, which are both produced by the human brain and less perceived by the sensory organs. In addition to the information received from other sensitive organs, people have an information system that consists of information generated by the inner light, such as “thoughts”, “conversion”, “values”, “self-esteem”. This internal system of knowledge creates a set of “internal” filters that concentrate and direct our senses (as well as lower, reverse and direct the signals that pass through the sense organs).

Sensory information is the first way to capture new information about a child to expand our “maps of the world.” Often, filters of already formed knowledge reveal new and potentially significant sensory information. One of the missions of NLP is to help people learn to accept greater sensory information as an extension of what Aldous Huxley called the “lower valve” of information. The founders of NLP, John Grinder and Richard Bandler, constantly emphasized in their teachings the need for “sensory input” in the absence of mental planning, or “halucinations.”

At the heart of most NLP techniques are the skills of caution, which allow you to maximize the use of immediate sensory input in any given situation. NLP believes that for successful change it is necessary to “get there”. For whom should we learn to remove the internal filters and remove direct sensory input from too much light. In fact, one of the most important beginners in NLP is the responsibility to leave the “uptime” station ( uptime). This is the name of the state in which all our sensory perceptions are focused on the external sharpness “here and now.” The state of “uptime” and as a result of the increased use of sensory information allows us to gain greater acceptance of life and avoid the appearance of new contentment, as well as the excessive impersonality of the possibilities of knowledge.

In this manner, our “dosvid” can be presented to “maps”, “theories” and “descriptions”, created with drive I'm sorry about that. In NLP there is a difference between firstі second good news. The first information must be brought to the attention of our relevant authorities. The second evidence is connected with verbal and symbolic maps that we create using a single method of displaying and ordering the primary evidence. The primary evidence is the function of our direct attention to too much territory. The second proof of the abstractions from our internal maps, descriptions and interpretations of the understanding and the essential reductions, creations and explanations (Fig. 1). With a thorough understanding, we do not feel the inhumanity and the super-sensitive thoughts behind the drive of what is perceptible and perceptible.



Small 1. Sensory evidence is the source of our patterns of light.


The very first evidence gives our soul its richness, sweetness and uniqueness. The first evidence inevitably turns out to be rich and thorough, be it a map or a description of what works can be built on its basis. People who are happy on the right and satisfied with their lives are able to absorb most of the information directly, without passing it through the filters of what they “try” or wait for testing.

According to NLP, our subjective evidence is “reality” for us and has the right to take precedence over any theories or interpretations with which we are comparable. NLP does not question the subjective validity of any evidence, but rather goes beyond basic phenomena (for example, “spiritual” or “evidence of past lives”). You can perceive theories and interpretations related to causal connections and social context, which in itself is essential information about our lives.

The techniques and rights of NLP have great significance. Activity based on NLP (especially scientific research) has a tendency to “become aware of it.” As soon as we accept this head-on, without noticing the worries of evaluations and ideas, our enemies appear richer and brighter.

Similar to other models of understanding NLP, Focus Moving helps us recognize the filters and maps that block and prevent the release of the world and our potential abilities. Once you know the benefits of these filters, we can switch to them. The meta-patterns of “Focus Movie” are to help people enrich their prospects, expand their “map of the world” and come to their own conclusions.

The principle of the “Focus Movie” pattern can be characterized as a change in personnel (in English. frame – frame), which flows into the reconversion and mental maps, on the basis of which the reconversion is inspired. These mothers allow people to “frame” their perceptions of these and other situations and experiences, to “place dividing signs in them” in a new way and evaluate them from different points of view.

Yak mov creates frames for proof

Words are not enough to convey our evidence. Often they place them in a frame, in which some aspects are in the foreground, while others serve as background. Let’s take a look, for example, at the following words: “ale”, “i/a” and “navit yakscho”. When we connect our ideas or experiences with them, words tempt us to focus our attention on different aspects of these experiences themselves. The phrase “The sun is shining today, otherwise tomorrow will be rainy” evokes our anxiety about tomorrow’s rain, while we practically do not accept the fact that today is sunshine. If you connect this affirmation with the word “a”: “Today the sun is shining, and tomorrow there will be light,” then the voice of meaning falls, however, on the basis of resentment. If we say: “Today the sun shines, let the sun shine tomorrow,” then our respect will be focused on the first stronghold, and our friend will be lost in the background (Fig. 2).



Small 2. Singing words set frames for our experiences, hanging different aspects to the foreground


The installation of new frames and reframing of this type does not lie in the place of the viruses themselves. For example, in the affirmation “I am happy today, ale I know what’s wrong”, “I’m happy today і I know what’s wrong”, “I’m happy today, tell me how I know that without unnecessary meaning, a voice is destroyed in the same manner as in respects about the weather. It is fair to say: “I want to achieve results, ale і I have problems"; "I want to achieve results, tell me how I have problems."

The structure that occurs in humans regardless of the context is called patern. For example, these are people whose main role is to become a pattern of constant ill-will with the positive side of their guilt. For whom the word “ale” helps.

This type of motion picture can even be integrated into those in which we interpret a specific statement and situation and react to them. Think about the following affirmations: “You can do whatever you want if you are willing to do good for someone else.” 4
We thank Teresa Epstein for this butt.

This phrase is intended to evoke people’s confidence in their own strengths. She combines two significant elements of our justice into the causal-hereditary lanyard: “do everything you want” and “do well.” “Give whatever you want” - growling, madly, adding. The other part is not so bad - “do a good job.” Tim no less, by connecting them so that “doing whatever you want” is in the foreground, we create mind-sets for the greatest motivation, even the desire and desire to connect with the resources necessary for your career .

It will happen if you change the order of the words: “If you are ready to work hard, you can earn whatever you want.” Despite the fact that the firmness is based on these very words, having become weak, the readiness to “do good” naturally came to the fore. Now the phrase reminds me that I will try to recruit someone without being lazy, but with a more positive affirmation: “You can do whatever you want.” In another option, the ability to earn everything you want seems like a lot of effort. In the first place, the willingness to work is placed in the frame of the internal resource necessary for “doing whatever you want.” This slight difference can be made if it is understood and reasonably understood.

Reformulation behind the additional frame “Navit yakscho”

The ability to recognize verbal patterns allows us to create mental skills that can help us make sense of our experiences. The use of such a tool is to reshape it behind an additional frame “to guide it”. This pattern is found in the simple replacement of the word “ale” with the phrase “to know how” in any proposition, where the word “ale” changes or “values” a positive experience.

Zavdannya

Try vikoristati yoga for the offensive scheme:

1. Find out the affirmation in which positive experience is “meant” by the word “ale”.

I know a way out of the problematic situation, otherwise it may happen again.

2. Replace “ale” with “navet yaksho” and marvel at what your respect focuses on.

I know a way out of the problematic situation, but it may happen again.

This structure allows us to focus our attention on positive moments, while preserving our respectful outlook. This technique turned out to be even more effective among those who are adept at using the “so, well...” pattern.

2
FRAMEWORK AND REFRAMING

Framey

The frame, or the psychological “frame”, is related to the hidden directness that signifies our thoughts and actions. Whose sensory frames are transferred to the cognitive. context These are both different ideas and experiences. As can be seen from the title itself, the frame is framed by the interaction between a person and the extra light. Frames merge into those that we interpret around experiences and attitudes, how we react to them, thus ending the function of “placing accents” in these experiences and losing our respect. Unacceptable experiences, for example, can consume us entirely if we catch him in the frame five quills after the shower. However, despite all the life we ​​have lived, these experiences can seem completely banal. Frames make interactions more productive, as they determine which information does and does not correspond to its meaning.

An everyday example of the selection of frames is the “time-hour frame.” Having placed the sustrich and vikonannya on the right in the frame of ten hvilins, we signifi- cantly understand what we will be able to work on in this time period. Time-hour exchanges mean objects of respect, those and subjects that are ready for discussion, as well as the type and world of reports. Set completely different dynamics for the same time period, or set a time-hour frame of, say, one year or three years in size. Short-line frames encourage us to concentrate on current tasks, while longer-line frames open up the possibility of developing ideas in parallel. If you set a limit of 15 hours for a business meeting, Rozmova will be more focused on a specific task and is unlikely to turn into a last-minute brainstorming without any result.

In NLP, the most commonly used frames are the “result” frame, the “yakbi” frame, and the “return link to the opposite side” frame. The main goals for the result, for example, are concentration and increased respect for the goal and goal. By placing a frame on the result, we inevitably recognize the value of any activity or information for achieving a specific goal (Fig. 3).



Small 3. Frames show respect and pour into the interpretation of this


The frame of the result is completely contrasted with the frame of the problem (Table 1). The frame of the problem gives the main meaning to what is “wrong” and “unnecessary”, and not to what is “right” or “necessary”. Some people tend to focus on unnecessary symptoms and their causes. p align="justify"> The result frame, however, is focused on the desired results and results, as well as on the resources necessary to reach them. In this way, the frame conveys to the result that people are oriented toward the most pressing problems and positive future ones.


Table 1

The frame of the result is equal to the frame of the problem


Restoring the frame to the result conveys such actions as replacing the formulation of the problem with the formulation of the goal, and the descriptions of “negative” words with “positive” descriptions. From the perspective of NLP, any problem can be addressed as a call or ability to change, “virility” or learn what to do. With this approach, all “problems” are met with a satisfactory result. If a person says: “My problem lies in the fact that I am afraid of failure,” one can assume that the intended purpose of the one who speaks is to take away the blame from the one who is within reach of success. So, since the problem is that “profits are falling,” the most likely result is an increase in profits.

Often people unintentionally formulate the result in a negative form: “I want to stop messing around,” “I want to quit firing,” etc. . The invisible part of the thought “I want to stop being a boy” is the insistence of “being a boy.” When we frame the result, we ask ourselves: “What do you want?” or “What would you have realized if you weren’t such a fearful person?”

Of course, when looking for a serious problem, it is important to look for the symptoms and their causes. However, it is no less important to work in the context of the target’s reach. Otherwise, the investigation of symptoms and causes will not lead to a desired solution. As information is collected in connection with the outcome of the problem, solutions may be found if the problem itself is not fully resolved.

Other NLP personnel vikorist this very principle. The “yakbi” frame confuses us so much that we hope the result has already been achieved. The frame of “return on the opposite side” makes it possible to interpret visible problems, symptoms or problems as a turnaround, which helps to make adjustments that lead to success, and not as failure.

Obviously, the main function of the verbal patterns of “Focus Movie” is to help people learn to shift respect: 1) from the frame of the problem to the frame of the result, 2) from the frame of mercy to the frame of the turning point, and 3) from the frame of impossibility to the frame of “niby”. Descriptions of the situation with a female police officer, a psychiatrist, a doctor, a trainer and also illustrations of a change in the frame in which certain situations or situations are encountered. A psychiatrist, a doctor, a generous uncle, a mother and a trainer - each of them helped his partner to change the relationship between the “problematic” or “reconciliatory” situation so that he was in the frame of the result or the turning point. Shifting respect from the problem to the result allowed the heroes to discover new possibilities. (To say that the policewoman saw herself as a master from a television studio, this is a metaphorical way of interfering with the frames to the result of the turning point: in this case, the emphasis is on “repairs”, and not on the “sparing” of unnecessary speeches.)

This guide is one of the most popular works in our country by Robert Dilts, a trainer and NLP practitioner. Regardless of the fact that the author of the book is a renowned master of neurolinguistic programming, this book will be useful not only for training beginners in spelling, but also for creating internal psychological motivation, but also for developing creative abilities and creativity miscellaneous

Description

Name: Focus your language change and use additional NLP (Sleight Mouth Magic Conversational Belief Change)

Book release date: 1999

This guide is one of the most popular works of Robert Dilts, a trainer and NLP practitioner. Regardless of the fact that the author of the book is a renowned master of neurolinguistic programming, this book will be useful not only for training beginners in spelling, but also for creating internal psychological motivation, but also for developing creative abilities and creativity miscellaneous

The basis for writing “Focus Movies” was the concept, which in NLP is called framing (from the English frame - frame) - the whole creation of various psychological and physical frames for any kind of solidification for changing the format of the transformation. I. Framing has nothing to do with what is sometimes called verbal balancing act. Focus helps us change focus and look at objects differently. You can say that the title of the book is a play on words: “movie tricks” as tricks (tricks, magic - 1) and as focusing (analogy from optics, angle, concentration on specific details -2).

This very handbook of Dilts became the basis for another lesson on the development of creative thinking on our website. 14 movie tricks, taken from Dilts, will help you find the right perspective to view any object or situation in order to continue further creative stages of the lateral mental process.

On our website there are materials related to the topic of this book. Below is a list of pages with these materials.

Neurolinguistic programming has a special concept for finding the required focus, called framing. Frame (English - frame) - the context for viewing any speech, using which you can change the tone of the speech.

Try to identify all possible interpretations of that same phenomenon. Dilts knows no less than 14 different ways to change the focus of our vision.

  1. Re-assignment: replacing one of the words that appears in the formula of the transformation with a new word with a different connotation (for example, euphemism).
  2. Analogy: replacing the given phrase with another one similar to the given one, otherwise the new phrase is liable to change the sense of the final judgment.
  3. Namir: switching respect zadannya chi namir, prihovani za perekonannyam.
  4. Butt stock: the search for exclusion from the rules that stand behind the reconstitutions.
  5. World model: re-evaluation (or change) from the position of another model of the world.
  6. Metaframe: assessment of reconversion from a frame without interruption, specifically oriented to the context - creation of reconversion before reconversion.
  7. Heritage: Respect is directed to the legacy of this reconstitution, which allows us to change and change the reconstitution.
  8. Second result: switching to the terminal from the stated in the re-conversion, in order to steal or secure the re-conversion stands.
  9. "Chunkdown": change or alteration of the re-coating, as indicated by the re-construction, by further crushing the re-construction elements into smaller parts.
  10. “Uzagalnennya” (eng. Chunkup): The welded parts are reconstituted to a high level, which allows you to change or enhance the interconnections that are indicated in these reconstitutions.
  11. Change frame size: re-evaluation (and strengthening) of the subtext of the re-contextualization in these troubling (or short) hour-long frames, from the sight of a large number of people (and other people), from a wider and narrower perspective.
  12. Hierarchy of criteria: re-evaluation (or value) is based on the criterion that outweighs the significance of any of those on which the re-conversion is based.
  13. Reality strategy: The re-evaluation (or value) of the re-construction is based on the fact that re-conversions are created with the help of the cognitive process of assimilation to the world.
  14. Suspension to yourself: The assessment of the formulation of the transformation itself is based on the interaction and criteria that are assigned to these transformations.

about the author

Robert Brian Dilts It is one of the well-known luminaries of daily NLP. This includes the first students of John Grinder and Richard Bandler - the founders of neurolinguistic programming. These professional beginners will know work in a variety of areas: modeling human intelligence, creating computer programs that interact between people and computers, business consultations, conducting trainings and lectures on practical matters. psychology and much more.

Vin is one of the first distributors of NL. Having started in 1975, they became one of the first students of John Grinder and Richard Bandler. Robert also started working with Milton Ericson and with Gregor Bateson. Now Robert Dilts is the founder of one of the largest NLP universities in the world and the organizer of a large number of international conferences in Santa Cruz.

In addition to the important benefits of NLP in such projects as illumination, creativity and leadership, Robert’s special contribution to NLP is the disaggregation of technologies for changing the strategy of thought and systems, as well as the development of such projects, know how to use them rejected the name “NLP system”. Axis of all the disaggregated technologies and models: reimprinting, integration of conflicting transitions, linguistic techniques “Focus Move”, strategy of a competent worksheet, method of allergy relief, neurological equalities , change the cycle, use generative NLP and much more.

Robert Dilts is the author of numerical technologies, books and articles. He has published nearly 50 books on neurolinguistic programming, including: “Reconnaissance with the help of NLP”, “Modeling with the help of NLP”, “NLP: Beginners for Effective Leadership”, “Strategies of Geniuses”, “Reconnaissance. Ways to health and prosperity”, “Focusi Movi” and others. His most significant work is the “Encyclopedia of NLP” in two volumes, which he wrote simultaneously from J. Delozier.

Share with friends or save for yourself:

Vantaged...