Expert assessment of increased competitiveness and liquidity of dental clinics based on risk management. Conceptual basis and structuring of methodology for managing the risks of production systems

Relevance of dissertation research. Globalization processes that are ongoing, growing global competition and serious political changes, increased freedom of trade and investment on a regional and global scale, increasing terrorist activity activity and man-made disasters, weakening of government regulation in the main areas of the Russian economy, high level of wear and tear of machines, possession and transport means , total informatization is rapidly developing, organizational changes and restructuring of enterprises as a result of liquidation and polishing, reengineering and diversification lead to an increase in the risks of external and internal the real middle ground of Russian industrial enterprises of various galuzes and forms of power.

The need for a transition to an innovative type of economy in the Russian Federation, the trends in the development of the pharmaceutical industry, which are evident in the growing industrial production, agriculture, aviation-industrial complex of Russia, and so with increased capitalization Russian enterprises, to create an objective demand in the Russian market for risk management services and in the creation faulty infrastructure risk management, which allows you to reduce the level of risk in the business atmosphere.

The results of investigations carried out by such leading international insurance and consulting companies in Galuzia for risk management as March, AIG, AON, Willis and others, as well as the non-profit partnership “Russian Partnership for Risk Management” (NP “RusRisk” "), talk about those , that: it is practical from all the most important risks for Russia to face an extremely high risk; in general, the crisis situation in Russia is almost twice as tense as in the countries of Europe and the USA; Foreign leaders estimate Russian risks to be 10-15% higher, but Russian managers, and bureaucrats and managers of a higher level of Russian enterprises, estimate the risk to be at 4% higher.

The designated situation was considered by those who were interested in risk management on the side of those involved in management.

Attempts by the management of successful Russian industrial enterprises to develop mechanisms and risk management tools did not provide effective, comprehensive and systematic risk management through the use of a valuable methodology ії risk management, which covers the specifics of the insurance operation and the development of industrial enterprises and production systems (PS). In the aviation and industrial complex (AIC) of Russia, a similar practice is at an early stage - the stage of understanding the need for risk management.

On the other hand, the study of foreign risk management research has shown that the expansion of management tools and technologies cannot be completely different from waste management enterprises and will not lead to of the results obtained, the fragments are oriented towards others, which are very controversial among the Russians, the minds of the government.

Also, the creation of a full-fledged theoretical and methodological basis for risk management and the development of a methodology for managing PS risks are objectively relevant.

The level of scientific complexity of the problem. At this time, domestic and foreign theory and practice are developing their own approaches and management methods that will be used in the most important tasks of managing the risks of enterprises.

Significant contributions to the development of the theory of risk management and risk management were made by V.M. Akhundov, I.T. Balaban, Thomas JI. Barton, T.I Bachkai, P. Bernstein, V.M. Vyatkin, V.A. Gamza, V.M. Granaturov, M.V. Grachova, N.G. Danilochkina, O.N.Dmitriev, Yu.Yu. Katerinoslavsky, A.A. Kolobov, G.B. Kneiner, B.A. Lagosha, N. Luman, A.A. Lobanov, M. McCartney,

V.V. Milnik, F. Knight, I.M. Omelchenko, M.O. Rogiv, K. Redhead, A.S. Sarkisyan, Yu.V. Sidelnikov, A.I. Sobol, O.D. Solozhentsev, V.L. Tambovtsev, L.M. Tepman, Paul L. Walker, E.V. Utkin, S.G. Falko, D.A. Frolov, T. Flin, N.V. Khokhlov, E.Yu. Khrustalov, S. H'yus, J.J. Hampton, A.B. Chavunov, E.M. Churkin, William G. Shenkir et al.

The theoretical foundations of the functioning and development of vibration systems were formed and researched by domestic and foreign scientists V.D. Kalachanova, F.I. Paramonov, Richard B. Chase, Yu. M. Soldak, V.I. Tikhomirov, Nicholas J. Equiline, Robert F. Jacobs et al.

Investigations into risk management in this and other worlds, related to the problems of financial management and enterprise value assessment, personnel development and socionics, organizational and investment valuable design and other complex problems were carried out by Yu.P. Aniskin, M. Armstrong, N.G. Bazadze,

C.B. Valdaitsevim, N.G. Verstina, K. Davis, Yu.Ya. Oleneva, A.M. Eropkinim, Yu. V. Ivanov, Yu.V. Kozirem, O.P. Kovaljovim, E.D. Korshunova, T. Copeland, T. Koller, J. Murrin, E.S. Minaevim, L.M. Putyatina, V.P. Panagushin, V.B. Rodinovym, Mark K. Scott, O.M. Troshin, E.S. Filatova and a lot of others.

However, regardless of the obvious interest and significance of the number of scientific works published by the rest of the world and dedicated to the problems of risk management, the low principle of important theoretical, methodological and methodical nutritional risk management is not widespread in in the whole world, and all actions from work are affected by the problems of managing the risks of the PS.

Until now, there has been a lack of discussion about how to interpret the understanding of “risk management” and “risk management”, and the most important industrial system itself,” and the concept of “risks of industrial systems” is viewed practically by the Fahivists.

Today, domestic and foreign theory and practice offer a number of methods and techniques for assessing risk management, but economic science and practice have not developed uniform conceptual and methodological approaches to management of the PS risks, until the system of management of the PS risks is in place.

It is impossible for any other concept to embrace the specificity of the PS, which is related, firstly, to those that the industry is, on the one hand, the main element of the PS, on the other, to the PS itself, and, on the other hand, to those that function nya i The development of the PS, aimed at meeting the needs of high-quality products (services) for the effective operation and interconnection of system elements, will ensure the continued development and strategic stability of the enterprise.

In addition, the current approaches to managing the risks of the PS do not consider management from a position to serve the purposes of all involved individuals (stakeholders) and financial and economical contributions to various markets. kah, related to the activity of the PS. This will lead to an imbalance in the classification of risks, to a shortening of the set of tools and methods of assessment and influx on risks and unharmonized management of PS risks.

Also, this research is aimed at the development of the theory and methodology of managing the risks of the PS, which ensures the peculiarities of the functioning and development of the PS, which is relevant, is of great national significance and allows us to solve the scientific problem for security of the development and stable functioning of enterprises of the aviation-industrial complex (AIC) on rinku. for the implementation of a systemic, comprehensive, uninterrupted and purposeful management of the risks of the PS.

The object and subject of dissertation research. The object of the research is the virtualization system, which implements the process of generating competitive products (services) in the minds of the external and internal environment, which is dynamically changing. Based on the specification of the object of investigation, the PS of the AIC of Russia was selected.

The subject of this research is the theoretical, methodological and applied aspects of PS risk management, which conveys an organic relationship between the technology and organization of risk management.

The method of dissertation research is the development of theoretical principles and warehouse methodologies for managing PS risks, as well as organizational and economic methods and practical implementation in agricultural enterprises based on the creation systems that will ensure stable development and efficient functioning of enterprises.

To implement the stated goal in the work, the following tasks were formulated and implemented:

1. Investigation of important trends in the development and critical situation of industrial production in the Russian Federation, analysis and development current peculiarities processes for managing the risks of industrial enterprises and PS of the agro-industrial complex. Identification on this basis of the essence and change to understand the risks of the PS, management of the risks and risk management of the PS and the creation of a specified definition of data to understand.

2. Vision and investigation of changes of mind and development of theoretical approaches and principles of managing PS risks as a special type of risks associated with the stable development and stable functioning of the industrial enterprise.

3. Exploration of the conceptual foundations and methodology for managing the risks of the PS on the basis of the hypotheses and current fundamental concepts of management (valuable-valuable and group-oriented features).

4. Exploration of the theoretical and methodological provisions of the created PS risk management system (SURPS) based on the vartis approach to management.

5. Modeling the process of managing the risks of the PS along management horizons, which conveys the structuring of criteria and the formation of a system of indicators of the functioning of the SURPS, the development of the functional structure of the system and the proposal of a harmonized mechanism rule by the riziks of the PS.

6. Development of methodological provisions for organizing the management of PS risks, the creation of an organizational and economic mechanism for the selection of forms, schemes and models of risk management that correspond to the goals of risk management and risk management. please let me know the PS.

7. Exploration of the methodological foundations for establishing the effectiveness of insurance protection and self-insurance, a set of methods and procedures for assessing and managing technical, personnel, market risks and management risks, which are considered the main risks of the insurance company.

8. Development of organizational and economic methods for creating information security and mechanisms for the implementation of SURPS.

9. Assessing the effectiveness of the established methodology for managing the risks of PS AIC in the form of SURPS.

The methodological basis of the investigation is theoretical. The research is based on theoretical and methodological principles, classical and current fundamental concepts that are found in the classics of economic and management science, as well as domestic and foreign scientists that work with economics, organization and management of enterprises and PS, risk management and risk management . To enhance the objectives of the dissertation, a complex of scientific basic and applied theories, approaches and methods was developed that would be related to the main aspects of managing the risks of PS, and itself: system analysis, management theory, multiplicity theory, those The theory of certainties and mathematical statistics, the theory of making decisions, the theory of vartosti assessment, the theory of riziku, as well as methods of economic-mathematical modeling, logical and financial-economic analysis, empirical research, methods of expert assessments, etc.

Modeling, monitoring of the external and internal environment, identification and assessment of PS risks, as well as managerial input to the risks was carried out with the help of the selected representatives and creations of the authors in the process before Coherence of methods and models.

In the research process for carrying out developments and modeling, the standard and original software created by the author were used and products were used.

Information basis of investigation. The dissertation work is based on the following statistical materials from the State Statistics Committee of the Russian Federation for 1991-2006, data from the Galuzian institutes of the agro-industrial complex from assessments and forecasts of social economical development enterprises, data and results of expert interviews with managers and facilitators of agricultural enterprises, survey-analytical and statistical materials published in the periodical press, and results of monitoring, about carried out by international and national professional risk management associations, as well as materials and recommendations of scientific and practical conferences , seminars, academic sessions and international forums.

The information base of the dissertation research was also composed of materials from monographs and articles of domestic and foreign scientists on this problem, published in special and periodical publications, and from Internet resources.

Scientific heritage of dissertation research. The most significant scientific results obtained in the course of advanced dissertation research and submitted to the defense department are:

1) a systematic integrated approach to the current great scientific and practical problem of increasing the effectiveness of the functioning of the PS based on the development of the theory and development of the methodology for managing the risks of the PS, which will ensure the continued development and stability the lack of functioning of the enterprise in the minds of market instability;

3) the conceptual basis for managing PS risks, the methodology for managing PS risks and the creation of a system for managing PS risks based on the vartis approach to management;

4) a methodological approach to the classification of PS risks, which is based on risk-creating factors and on the projections of business processes on the area and middle management, a balanced classification of PS risks ;

5) a set of indicators for a clear and precise assessment of the risks of PS, a system of indicators for the functioning of the SURPS, criteria for the functioning of the SURPS - fundamental value on the strategic level, economically added to artistry (EVA) on a tactical level and return on capital (ROE) on an operational level;

6) the results of studying the interrelation between the business development strategy and the strategy, forms and types of management of PS risks, the organizational and economic mechanism of harmonized management of PS risks;

7) a set of organizational and economic models, schemes and forms of risk management and the approach to organizing their selection, the approach to organizing the management of the risks of the substation with the arrangement of the financial model of the enterprise on the basis and Vartosti centers, an organizational and financial model for risk management, which is based on risk centers ;

8) methodological approach to assessing the effectiveness and selection of insurance instruments and self-insurance, assessing the feasibility of insurance of insurance risks based on the identified characteristics of risks with a balanced classification these are the risks;

9) conceptual model of managing the risks of the PS, structural and functional model of SURPS based on the modular principle of incentives, methods of creating information security and organizational and economic mechanism for the implementation of SURPS, method of evaluating the effectiveness news about the implementation of SURPS;

10) methodological foundations, economic models and methods for assessing and managing technical, personnel risks and business management risks are consistent with the establishment of methodological bases for assessing and managing PS risks.

Before abstracting the results of the dissertation research, it is necessary to carry out practical testing of the dissertation's methodological provisions, methods and models at low-level enterprises of the agro-industrial complex, which confirmed the effectiveness of their implementation in management not by PS. The results have been distilled down to the level of practical recommendations, which allowed us to highlight the particularities and effectiveness of the fragmented methodology.

Scientific novelty of dissertation research. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the fact that the author has broken down the methodology for managing the risks of manufacturing systems. The specification of the designated scientific novelty associated with significant scientific results is reflected in the following basic provisions:

1. The methodology for risk management has been developed, which makes it possible to increase the efficiency of the functioning of industrial enterprises through a systemic, comprehensive, continuous and direct risk management based on a proven approach iv, principles and economical methods of classification, evaluation, management input into risks and risk management.

2. A complex of problems of managing the risks of industrial enterprises and PS of the agro-industrial complex has been identified, and on this basis, theoretical approaches, methodological approaches and principles of managing the risks of PS have been developed, which allow the implementation of new needs The bottom is the paradigm of risk management, which transfers risk management to the boundaries of all enterprises.

3. It is scientifically structured and divided into a comprehensive methodology for managing PS risks, based on which systemic signs, local characteristics and organizational and economic mechanisms for managing PS risks have been identified, with The purchase of which is represented by the system for managing the risks of production systems (SURPS).

4. A set of indicators has been formed and tools for assessing PS risks have been developed, tools for monitoring and risk management have been developed, which allow for the recognition of the peculiarities and mental functioning of PS, development Need to adequately assess the risks of the PS and apply the selection of methods to the risks.

5. The functional structure of the SURPS has been established, subdivided into the conceptual foundations of risk management, which makes it possible to establish types of relationships between the goals of the system, functions and management tasks across the horizon. ah and control bodies across system modules.

6. Criteria for the effectiveness of the functioning of the SURPS have been established, which makes it possible to monitor the functioning of the system on strategic, tactical and operational management horizons. It was established that the factors for shaping the economic effect and the warehouse social effect in the development of SURPS, which allowed the development of a model for shaping the effect of risk management, which is an economical interpretation of the conceptual model of management іння різіками PS.

7. Methodological approaches have been developed for organizing the management of PS risks, which allow achieving effective management. A methodological approach has been proposed that promotes the possible appearance of the level of development of PS and the progressiveness of different technologies for managing them when choosing a form and scheme for risk management, as well as when choosing a structure core system, When the functional tasks of risk management are divided, the rights and compatibility between the elements of the system.

8. Methods and models for assessing and managing personnel risks of the PS have been developed, which allows for conducting a personnel audit, developing the personnel profile of the PS and adapting methods to the risks of hundreds of personnel risks and thereby ensuring the assessment of personnel risks are dependent on the personnel profile of the PS and the influx of risks change in the quality of enterprise.

9. Rozrobleni methodical approach This is a method of comprehensive assessment of the risks in the management of the PS, which allows one to evaluate the risks based on the quality of management and the skill of managers to the risks depending on their psychological type. A procedure has been established for assessing the skill of managers before the risk when choosing a form of managing the PS risks, which is recommended to be used when implementing the mechanism of harmonized management of the PS risks.

10. A method for assessing and managing technical risks of a PS has been proposed, which makes it possible to assess risks based on risk factors and to select a strategy for managing technical risks. This is due to the acceptable level of risk management and the accepted form of risk management.

The scientific novelty of the results of the dissertation research as its principle of innovative cognitive brilliance lies integrally in the fact that in the original author’s version a comprehensive management methodology is proposed and developed and the organization of risk management of the PS of the daily agro-industrial complex of Russia as a special type of internal company management, as well as the methodology for interpreting the results of the assessment and monitor, methods of managerial influx on the risks of PS of this category

The reliability of the statements, conclusions and recommendations contained in the dissertation is confirmed by the use of well-equipped scientific instruments, sources, correct processing and interpretation of the meanings obligations of reliable primary output data. The reliability of the obtained results is based on the adoption of pleasantly harsh assumptions and assumptions, on the basis of the established results of theoretical studies and tested mathematical and software support and ensures the correctness of the analytical results. calculations and scientific interpretation of theoretical motives and developmental results.

The reliability and validity of the proposed solutions and recommendations for the implementation and implementation of the main results of the dissertation work are conclusively confirmed by the results of the implementation of the system for managing the risks of the PS and its elements at the bottom. and industrial enterprises and companies.

The practical significance of the results of dissertation research is determined and confirmed:

There is an obvious need for current Russian industrial enterprises and agro-industrial complex enterprises to develop a methodology for managing the risks of PS, due to the need to ensure steel development and effective functioning Bath PS in the Rinku Drains;

Indirect research and promotion of the removal of scientific and scientific-applied results - new objects intellectual power in the practice of managing agro-industrial complex enterprises;

It is possible to expand the fragmented methodology of risk management to a wide range of industrial and, possibly, other enterprises, as well as their application in the selection of firm-specific management decisions for industrial facilities Russia.

The promotion of a fragmented methodology for managing the risks of the PS on the basis of the stagnation of the vartis approach to management will allow us to take more adequate and informed decisions when assessing and infusing them into the risks of the PS. The SURPS has been expanded, the classification of PS risks and the strategy for harmonized management of PS risks have been balanced, methods for assessing the effectiveness of insurance and assessing private types of PS risks, as well as the disaggregation of procedures and regulations for Provadzhenya SURPS vikorystayutsya and may but vikoristany nadali in the activities of industrial enterprises of various galuzy, consulting and insurance companies with: development of projects from the development and implementation of corporate risk management systems; setting goals and choosing a risk management strategy is similar to the enterprise strategy; conducting an internal risk audit, assessing technical, personnel, market risks and management risks; make decisions regarding the selection of methods and tools for insurance protection of PS risks; assessing the effectiveness of risk management systems.

The methodology for managing the risks of the PS has been established, as well as the methods and techniques presented in the dissertation that can be used and can be used in the initial process both within the framework of basic and additional forms of education.

Approbation and promotion of the results of dissertation research.

The main provisions of the dissertation were confirmed and received a positive assessment at international and all-Russian scientific and practical conferences, congresses and seminars in Moscow (2001, 2003-two, 2004, 2005-three, 20 06 rub.), in Rostov-on-Don (2002 rub. ). ), from Krasnoyarsk (born 2003), from Penzi (born 2004).

The results of the investigation, the issuance and recommendations were analyzed and implemented at a number of industrial enterprises, zokrem: LLC "NVO "Tekon-Avtomatika", FSUE "PO Zhovten", VAT "MMP im. V.V. Chernishov", VAT MPO im. I. Rumyantseva, FSUE RSK "MIG" and other companies, as well as lighting organizations, which is confirmed by confirmatory acts of promotion and recovery.

The results of the robot are reviewed in the initial process:

At the Moscow Aviation Institute (State Technical University), when setting up lecture courses on the discipline “Risk Management and Insurance” for the preparation of master’s degrees and “Financial Management” for learned about pre-school programs professional education(DPO);

At MDTU “Stankin”, when setting up and delivering a course of lectures in the discipline “Enterprise Risk Management” for the preparation of economists-managers and masters, as well as specialists from MBA and DPO programs;

At the Institute of Indestructibility and Daily Business, the course “Management of Financial Risks” and “Management of Investment Projects” is taught during the hour of preparation of facilitators from further education programs;

Within the framework of the Intergaluz program for training personnel for the market economy, which is supported by the Moscow Fund for Personnel Training and support for the Department of Support and the development of small enterprises in the Moscow City Council, the students from the complex disciplines “Enterprise Management”, “Finance Management”, “Innovation Management”.

The provisions of the dissertation work were developed during the implementation of low-scientific, corporate lighting and consulting projects.

Author's publications on the legacy of dissertation research. Instead, the results of dissertation research were published in 37 major works, including 3 monographs and 21 scientific articles, 10 of which were published in scientific journals, published by the Higher Attestation Commission of Russia. The total volume of monographs, brochures, initial publications, articles and other materials should be over 193 d.a., including 78.9 d.a. written specifically by the applicant.

Structure of the dissertation. The dissertation consists of an introduction, 5 sections, which include abstracts from the skin section, abstracts, bibliography, bibliography and supplements.

5.5. Symbols behind the section 5

1. The most important methodological aspect of the methodology for managing the risks of industrial systems is the development of models and methods of assessment and management of specific risks, which extends to the development of the conceptual foundations of risk management and balanced classification. ї risks of PS. The main risks associated with the peculiarities of the functioning of the PS, the most important and at the same time the most effective ones, based on the position of the methodology for assessing and managing the operational risks and, structural, technical, personnel risks, riziki dii management. Before these risks, we can also highlight market risks that create interest in connection with the active investment activity of industrial enterprises on the stock market and the market. valuable papers.

2. An integrated method for assessing and managing technical risks allows not only to identify risk factors and install their input into risks, but also to evaluate technical risks based on the model of the availability of technical risks. risk factors, and it is necessary to choose a strategy for managing technical risks. The implementation of the fragmented method within the framework of SURPS will ensure the overall security of the enterprise and will reduce the financial results of the operation of the substation.

3. Steady development and strategic stability of the enterprise will require the establishment of the enterprise above the market, securing capital above the market, which, in its own way, will ensure the management of market risks. In connection with this, a methodology was developed for assessing and managing market risks, which allows us to identify key risk factors and determine the characteristics of the current market risk sector, assess the influx of key factors into risk portfolio of the business and, as a result, increase the calculation of the UAYA according to the prescribed procedure using the victorious method Monte Carlo method of historical realizations.

4. One of the main risks that directly influences the effective functioning of the PS and the management of which will ensure the stable establishment of the enterprise on the market, market oriented activities, and personnel risks. A comprehensive system of methods and models for assessing and managing personnel risks allows for the assessment of risks based on the personnel profile and their incorporation into changes in the performance of the enterprise. A system of methods and models has been developed and brought to the level of methodological developments, which allows for conducting personnel audits in enterprises, adapting methods for managing risks and motivating management inputs into risks, which promotes the establishment of accepted resources. This is the best way to manage personnel resources.

5. The implementation of a systematic, continuous, comprehensive and purposeful management of PS risks, which is emphasized by the new paradigm of risk management, implies the need for assessment and management of risks for management. Management of a group of risks, on the one hand, is associated with the provision of a stable stable establishment of a business above the market in part with the implementation of a fragmented strategy, the creation and strengthening of competitive advantages and security Increased profitability of enterprise, on the other hand, due to the strength of management and the special features of managers. Based on this, a method of comprehensive assessment of business risks for managers has been developed, which allows: to ensure that the specifics of assessing the effectiveness of management are taken into account in a particular approach before assessing the value of the business, to evaluate the risks of ії for management to assess the quality of management in the enterprise, to establish the ability of managers to take risks and accept The risk of decision-making is based on the psychological type, reflecting the tendency of managers to take risks when choosing/implementing a form of risk management.

6. The detailed methodological basis for assessing and managing the main risks of reproductive systems consists not only of a separate method and model, but also practical recommendations that allow for the assessment and management of specific risks. active and integral principles of PS within the framework of SURPS.

VISNOVOK

The dissertation work contains the results of scientific research, taken by the author in the process of extensive learning of the problems of managing the risks of industrial enterprises and production systems in the Russian Federation and behind the border, as well as the practical evidence of the author in the government department Lensky consultation.

It is clear that the main results of the investigation, which include complex problems of managing the risks of the PS from the development of theoretical, methodological and methodical ambushes to practical recommendations and implementation, I believe to the future.

1. A very urgent scientific problem has been posed to synthesize and test the basic components of the methodology for managing the risks of PS, which is of great socio-economic and scientific significance and is directly aimed at ensuring the development and strategic stability hundred powers.

2. In the future, the industrial production of the Russian Federation is characterized by positive development trends and related transformations associated with the globalization of the economy and growing global competition, the development of innovative and integration processes, due to the extremely accelerated pace of change in the external and internal functioning, with the need to strengthen social diversity I will protect my business. The peculiarities of current industrial and agricultural enterprises should be noted: the importance of depletion of fixed assets in the non-network stabilization of investments for their creation; high level of external and internal risks; the current level of overcoming potential risks in the crisis of enterprises through systemic and comprehensive risk management; weak management and overcrowding of a significant number of enterprises. Analysis and analysis of the specifics of risk management processes of industrial enterprises and PS of the agro-industrial complex indicate the increasing influx of risk management into the performance of enterprises and the important influx of PS functioning at the level of capital. Talents of Russian companies. In the near future, effective and adequate management of enterprises will not be possible without risk management, and enterprise management systems will need to integrate risk management systems.

3. Investigation of changes of mind and analysis of the main theoretical approaches to risk management to confirm the existence of a valuable theoretical and methodological basis for risk management and management methodology, What is the specificity of the operation and the particular development of industrial enterprises and PS. The situation requires the development of conceptual foundations and a comprehensive methodology for managing the risks of PS. Based on the research consistency of theoretical and applied warehouse management methodologies in the sphere, the methodology of risk management of the substation enterprises should be considered as a set of mutually dependent hypotheses, principles, approaches, procedures, method iv, models and assessments that will require special development and systemic ordering.

4. The theoretical basis for managing the risks of PS is formed and put into practice, including basic and applied theory and basic approaches, basic principles and postulates. Proposal of a new place of risk PS allows you to become a doctor specific features and to create an adequate assessment of the risks of the PS, and to reveal the essence and the author’s interpretation of the understanding of “management of the PS risks” and “risk management of the PS” to provide sufficient intelligence for the development of a comprehensive harmonized management of the risks PS and rational organization of the process of managing them.

5. The implementation of a new and necessary paradigm for risk management meant the development of the conceptual foundations of PS risk management, which is based on: the hypothesis of the interconnection of the current development and strategic stability of the state with stable development and stable functioning of enterprises on the market and with stable development and direct effective functioning; hypotheses of the overgrowth of the implementation of PS risks during the business crisis; the conceptual approach of groups of dedicated individuals and the virtuous (valuable) approach to management. In the work, a theoretical and methodological framework has been established to establish the vartis approach to managing the risks of the PS, the specific characteristics of the PS have been identified and the essential infusion of the functioning of the PS has been brought to the varity of enterprises. The work has also achieved that the use of a comprehensive approach will ensure the satisfaction of the interests of all involved individuals (stakeholders) when managing the risks of the PS, which, in its turn, will ensure the continued development and effectiveness PS is not functioning.

6. Management of risks, which allows increasing the efficiency of functioning and ensuring the development of the PS, is impossible without an adequate assessment and classification of the risks of the PS. Coming from this, the dissertation is proponated new approach Before classification, the methodology for assessing PS risks was developed. The pre-classification approach allows you to balance the risks of the PS behind the risks of increased flexibility, invariance and flexibility, as well as the basic principles of management, which will ensure compliance with The captured and implemented managerial influx into the PS riziks. Proposition of mathematical tools for assessing risks of PS allows different species Risks, obviously, before a separate classification, it is necessary to choose and establish methods and assessment models. A monitoring toolkit has also been developed, a graphical classification of risks into categories, and the establishment of risk acceptance zones based on the assessment. The selection and selection of computer models and software products was created to evaluate and make decisions regarding the management of PS risks.

7. Conceptual and structural synthesis of the methodology for managing the risks of the PS involves the formation of theoretical and methodological ambushes for the design of SURPS based on the vartic approach, which allows you to ensure the setting of parameters for the effective functioning of the PS. As part of the development of the SURPS methodology, a conceptual, structural and functional SURPS model has been developed in terms of two interconnected modules: risk management technologies (the process of risk management) and management organization nnya rizikami (rizik-management), which will ensure the implementation of a comprehensive, systemic, uninterrupted and goal-directed management of PS risks. The purpose of the system, the main aspects of its functioning and the process of designing the SURPS are determined, which allows for the possibility of a variety of design developments as typical for industrial enterprises and agricultural enterprises.

8. To ensure consistency between the goals of the enterprise management and the management of the PS risks, on the one hand, indicators of the effectiveness of the management of the enterprise and the management of the PS risks - from Otherwise, and between the goals set and indicators of management effectiveness, a system of performance indicators was developed from a third party SURPS. The formed system includes target, controlled and measured indicators, as well as integral, key and private indicators of risks, which are grouped according to management horizons with the establishment of interconnections between them. The selection of the identified indicators allows for the assessment and monitoring of PS risks and the establishment of criteria for the functioning of SURPS - fundamental value on the strategic level, economical added value (EVA) on the tactical level. return on capital (ROE) – on an operating level.

9. Within the framework of modeling the process of managing PS risks from strategic, tactical and operational horizons of management, a model of the interconnection between strategy and business development with strategies, forms and horizons for managing PS risks, as well as a model of monized management and a matrix of methods infused onto the risks of the PS. The proposed models make it possible to choose the most suitable forms and methods for managing the risks of the PS and to directly control the flow of control over the risks.

10. To select and manage the inflows to the risks of the PS, follow the conditions of the equipment for the purpose of vicarious insurance and self-insurance. The dissertation has developed and tested a methodological approach and related tools that include an assessment of the feasibility of insuring risks based on identifying the characteristics of risks, an assessment of the effectiveness instruments of insurance protection from the position of the insurer and the insurer, as well as the determination of the optimal combination of instruments of insurance protection and self-insurance.

11. Based on the established conceptual model of PS risk management, systemic, comprehensive and uninterrupted PS risk management conveys organic interactions between technology and organization of risk management . The work has broken down the methodological basis for organizing the management of PS risks, has proposed a mechanism for the selection of forms, schemes and models of risk management, which correspond to the level of development of enterprise and the progressiveness of developed technologies. Its management. A new approach has been proposed to organize the management of PS risks with the support of a financial business model based on Vartosti centers and related risk centers. The implementation of these developments allows us to achieve adequate and effective management of PS risks.

12. The most important methodological aspect of the methodology for managing PS risks is the development of models and methods of assessment and management of specific risks, leading to the development of conceptual foundations and a balanced classification of risks. The priority of this task was the formation of a consistent set of models, procedures, methods and techniques for assessing and managing the main types of PS risks, such as the selection of technical, market, personnel risks and business management risks.

13. By creating a toolkit for the implementation of risk management of the substation within the framework of information and organizational and methodological security of SURPS, methods for forming an information system for risk management, as well as Methods have been developed for creating and assessing the effectiveness of the implementation of SURPS, which will ensure that enterprises adequately and effectively manage PS risks.

14. Testing and promotion of the results of dissertation work in the form of theoretical, methodological, methodological and organizational recommendations, established methods and models at low-level enterprises of the agro-industrial complex, as well as their use in the provision of consulting their employees were allowed to reduce the level of risks and promote the efficiency of the functioning of the PS behind the adjacent warehouses. Zokrem at VAT “MMP im. V.V. Chernishev" the planned results were assessed, which showed that the estimated increase in enterprise value becomes 4-5%. The implementation of the pilot project for the creation of SURPS at the scientific and medium-sized business enterprise LLC "NVO "Tekon-Avtomatika" ensured an increase in the profitability of capital by 5%, an increase penny stream by 7%, as well as increasing the level of business security and strengthening the competitive advantages of the enterprise. In this case, the private effects of introducing several elements of the SURPS at the enterprises of the industry: increased control power, reduced costs and increased rhythmic functioning of the PS, reduced financial indicators sti enterprises and companies and others.

The implementation of research results in the practical activities of low-level industrial enterprises, agricultural enterprises and companies confirmed the scientific validity and practical integrity of the developments proposed by the author. The results of the investigation and recommendations were implemented and implemented at existing enterprises (acts of implementation presented in the supplement): BAT "National Institute of Aviation Technologies"

NDAT), FDUP "Virobniche ob'ednannya" Zhovten "", VAT "MMP im. V.V. Chernishov", VAT "MPO im. I. Rumyantsev", FSUE "Russian Lithuanian Lithuanian Corporation "MIG", LLC NVO "Tekon-Avtomatika", LLC "Scientific and Viral Research Center "SOYUZOTSENKA"", as well as the State Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Moscow State Technological University "STANKIN"" and GO At the Moscow Aviation Institute (National Technical University) "MAI".

1. Agapova I.I. History of economic thought: A course of lectures for people. -M: Tandem, 1998. 246 p.

2. Algin A.P. Facets of economic rizik. M.: Znannya, 1991. – 64 p.

3. Andriychikov A.V., Andriychikova O.M. Analysis, synthesis, planning of economic solutions. M.: Finance and Statistics, 2002. – 368 p.

4. Andriychikov A.V., Andriychikova O.M. Intelligent information systems: Pidruchnik. M.: Finance and statistics, 2004. – 424 p.

5. Aniskin Yu.P., Pavlova A.M. Planning and controlling: Pidruchnik. M: Omega-JI, 2003 - 280 p.

6. Antifilativ V.S., Emelyanov A.A., Kukushkin A.A. System analysis in management: Navch. Pos_bnik/Ed. A.A. Yemelyanova. M.: Finance and Statistics, 2002. – 368 p.

7. Akhundov V.M., Sobol A.I. Financial rizik. M: View of the Moscow Agricultural Academy, 2000. - 128 p.

8. Badalova A.G. Analysis of the main approaches to managing the risks of machine-building enterprises // Machine-building technology. 2005. -No. 11-S. 78-82

9. Badalova A.G. Analysis of the practice of risk management by domestic and foreign companies // Current management. 2005. - No. 10 – pp. 15-21

10. I. Badalova A.G., Eleneva Yu.Ya., Korshunova O.D. Analysis and systematization of approaches to assessing the effectiveness of management in small business practice. Library businessman. M.: MDTU "Stankin", 2003. - 42 p.

11. Badalova A.G., Eleneva Yu.Ya., Korshunova O.D. Assessment of management efficiency: theory, methodology, principles. M.: “YANUS-K”, 2002. – 218 p.

12. A. Badalova A.G. Vykorostannya economical added value and a balanced system of indicators when managing the risks of aviation enterprises //Aerospace engineering and technology. 2004. - No. 4 - P. 63-69

13. Badalova A.G. Main aspects of the theory of risk management // U zb. Current station of the investment and development complex of Russia: Zb. tr. Moscow keep.will.un-tu. M.: MDSU, 2003. – P. 194-204

14. Badalova A.G. The main problems in the development of venture capital business in Russia // U zb. Current problems of management 2001: Materials of the international scientific and practical conference. - VIP. 2-M.: State University of Education, 2001. -S. 8-12

15. Badalova A.G. The main problems of managing the risks of enterprise // Economy of everyday life 2005. - No. 9 – pp. 20-28

16. Badalova A.G., Pesselova R.I. ta in. Forecasting scientific and technical progress in the industry. Methodical recommendations, private forecasting methods M: VNIIPI, 1991.-168 z.

17. Badalova A.G. Principles of risk management // Evidence of the fakhivtsa s okorony pratsi. 2006. - No. 4 – pp. 49-53

18. Badalova A.G. Creation of a risk management system for enterprises // U zb. Current problems of management 2003: Materials of the international scientific and practical conference. -Vip. 5-M.: State University of Education, 2003. – P. 12-16

19. Badalova A.G. Theoretical rethinking of the creation of a system for managing the risks of enterprise // Bulletin of the Moscow Academy of the market of information technologies. 2004. No. 8 – P. 3-15

20. JO.Badalova A.G. Managing the production risks of machine-building enterprises//Technology of machine-building. 2004. No. 5-S. 78-80

21. Badalova A.G. Risk management is a new management paradigm // U zb. Modern machine building: ceramics with effective development: Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference. – M.: IC GOU MDTU “Stankin”, 2004. – P. 123-126

22. Badalova A.G. Risk management is a new methodological approach to the management of radio electronics industry enterprises // Design and technology of electronic devices. -2005. - No. 1 – pp. 61-63

23. Kommersant.Badalova A.G. Managing the risks of production systems: theory, methodology, mechanism of implementation. Monograph. M.: "Stankin", "YANUS-K", 2006. - 328 p.

24. Badalova A.G. The evolution of risk management for enterprises in the investment and development sector // Uzb. Current problems in the management of enterprises in the investment and development sphere: Zb. tr. M: MDSU, 2005.-S. 234-245

25. Badalova A.G. Economics of business. M: MAI. Information and publication center “Five Plus”, 2003. – 56 p. (3.5 d.a.)

26. Badalova A.G. Economic problems of risk management for enterprises // Uzb. Management Competitiveness. Automation: Zb. Sci. fuck off. VIP.1 – Rostov/Don: GOU DPO “ІУІ AP”, 2002. – P. 45-49

27. Bazadze N.G. Organizational design and development. M: MAI, 2004. -89 p.

28. AT.Bazadze N.G. Organizational design and development of managerial potential of science and science production: Monograph. M.: MAI, 2002. – 228 p.

29. AI.Balabanov I.T. Rizik management. - M.: Finance and Statistics, 1996.-192 p.

30. A2.Barlow P.E., Proshan F. Mathematical theory of reliability. M: Glad. Radio, 1969.-375 p.

31. Blagodatskikh V.I. Introduction to optimal control (linear theory): podruchnik/Ed. V.A. Sadivnichy. M.: Vishch.shk., 2001. – 239 p.

32. A.A.Bodrunov S.D., Dmitriev O.M., Koval'kov Yu.A. Aviation and industrial complex of Russia between the 21st century: problems of effective management. St. Petersburg: Aerospace Equipment Corporation, LLC Petrogradskiy Ta K0, 2001

33. AZ.Bokov V.V., Zabelin P.V., Fedtsov V.G. Enterprise risks and hedging in domestic and foreign economies: Head. additional help. M: View PRIOR, 2000. - 128 p.

34. Great Radian Encyclopedia. M: Radyanska Encyclopedia, 1980.

35. Great encyclopedic dictionary. M: Great Russian Encyclopedia: St. Petersburg: Norint, 2002. 1598 p.

36. Great Economic Dictionary / Ed. O.M. Azriliyana. 2nd view, add. and reworked M: Institute of New Economy, 1997. 860 p.

37. A9. Braley R., Myers S. Principles of corporate finance/Trans. from English -M: ZAT "Olymp-Business", 1997. 1120 p.

38. Val'd A. Post-mortem analysis/Trans. from English M.: Fizmatgiz, 1960. -451 p.

39. Veblen T. The theory of the permissible class. M.: Nauka, 1984. – 367 p.

40. Ventzel E.S., Ovcharov A.A. The theory of reliability and engineering programs. M.: Nauka, 1988. – 305 p.

41. Gamza V.A., Katerinoslavsky Yu.Yu. Risk spectrum of commercial organizations: Fig. Academy of Entrepreneurship. M.: ZAT “Publishing House “Economics”, 2002. – 108 items.

42. Gevorkyan A.M., Minaev E.S. both Economy and organization of production lethal devices. M: Mashinobuduvannya, 1995. -297 p.

43. Gmurman V.Ye. The theory of variables and mathematical statistics. M.: Vishcha School, 1997. – 304 p.

44. Y. Hobson J. Problems of poverty and unemployment. St. Petersburg, 1900. – 366 p.

45. Golubin A.Yu. Mathematical models of the theory of insurance. M: An-kil, 2003.-296 p.

46. ​​Gorshkov A.F. Substitution method. M.: KnoRus, 2004. – 184 p.

47. Sovereign system Documentation security management: External benefits to documents and documentation security services. -M: Golovarkhiv SRSR, 1991. 135 p.

48. Granatur V.M. Economic rizik: essence, methods of reduction, ways of reduction: Chief Pos_bnik. 2nd view, revised ta add. - M.: Vidavnitstvo "Right and Service", 2002. - 160 p.

49. Gumenyuk V.Є. Fundamentals of the creation of the Galuzev system for maintaining foreign-union classifiers of technical and economic information M.: Finance and Statistics, 1985. – 296 p.

50. Dal V.I. Tlumachny Dictionary of Living Language. In 4 vols. M.: Vidavnichy house RIPOL CLASSIC, 2002. – 2735 p.

51. Danilochkina N.G. Controlling: Basic guide. M.: Dobre Slovo, 2004. – 249 p.

52. Danilochkina N.G. ta in. Controlling as a tool for enterprise management/Ed. Danilochkina N.G. M: UNITI, 1998. - 250 p.

53. Dmitriev O.M., Bazadze N.G. Organization entrepreneurial activity in the sphere of scientific research, in Russia / Basic handbook for more basic foundations. M.: MAI and “Vidavnitstvo Gnome i D”, -2000 – 292 p.

54. Egerev I.A. Proficiency in business: management mystique: Chief assistant. -M: Right, 2003.-480 p.

55. Engalichev O.V. Improvement of the operational risk management system for enterprises: Abstract of thesis. Ph.D. ekon. Sciences: 08.00.05, M., 2005. – 16 p.

56. Eropkin A.M. Organizational behavior. M: Dobre Slovo, 2006. -376 p.81. Zade JI. The concept of linguistic change and stasis for making nearby decisions. M.: Svit, 1976. – 165 p.

57. Ch!> 2.3 ombart V. Bourgeois / Trans. with him. Institute of Sociology M.: Nauka, 1903. –443 p.

58. S3. Ivanov Yu.V. Business socionics. M: ZAT “Business School “Intel-Sintez”, 2001.-184 p.

59. M. Ignatieva A.B., Maksimtsov M.M. Research on control systems: Head. Handbook for universities. M.: UNITI-DANA, 2001. – 157 p.

60. Kalan R. Basic concepts of neural measurements. M., St.-Pb., Kiev: William, 2001.-287 p.

61. Kaplan Robert Z., Norton David P. The display system is balanced. From strategy to action. - 20th view, Vipr. ta add. / Per. from English - M: ZAT "Olymp-Business", 2004. - 398 p.

62. Kardanska H.JI. Praising managerial decisions: A handbook for universities. M.: UNITI, 1999. – 407 p.

63. Kashin S. Charming sticks for masters of finance // Secret of the Firm. -2004. - No. 33 (72).-S. 54-57

64. Kashcheev R.V., Bazoev S.Z. Shareholder management. M.: DMK Press, 2002. – 224 p.

65. Kene F. Vibranі economical creations. M.: Socekgiz, 1960. -551 p.91. Kneiner G.B., Tambovtsev B.JI. Enterprise in an unstable economic environment: risks, strategies, security. -M: Economics, 1997.-288 p.

66. Book of business people: Dovidnik/Ed. E.S. Minaeva. M.: Vishcha School, 1993. - 476 p.93. Kovalov A.P. What is the need for this “duta vartist”? // Obladnannya. 2003. No. 7(79) - pp. 17-19

67. Kovalov A.P. Vartis analysis. Chief assistant. M.: MDTU "Stan-kin", 2000. - 171 p.

68. Kozir Yu.V. Company performance: assessment and management decisions. -M: View "Alfa-Pres", 2004. -200 p.

69. Kondakov N.I. Logical dictionary-dovidnik M: Nauka, 1975. -720 p.

70. Komartsova L.G., Maksimov A.V. Nerocomp'yuteri. M: View of MDTU im. Not. Bauman, 2002. – 320 pp. 9%. Korn G., Korn T. A guide to mathematics for scientists and engineers. -M: Nauka, 1968. -720 p.

71. Korshunova O.D. Adaptive organizational development of industrial enterprises. -M: IC MDTU “Stankin”, “Janus-K2. 2004. 348 p.

72. Korshunova O.D., Eleneva Yu.Ya., Badalova A.G. ta in. Business management in small business practice. Library businessman. Course of lectures. M.: MDTU “Stankin”, 2002. – 214 p.

73. Copeland T., Koller T., Murrin J. Company performance: assessment and management / Translation from English. M.: ZAT "Olymp-Business", 1999. – 576 p.

74. Kochetkova A.I. Introduction to organizational behavior and organizational modeling. M.: Prava, 2003. – 944 p.

75. JIanycma M.G., Sharshukova L.G. Risks of entrepreneurial activity. M.: INFRA-M, 1998. – 224 p.

76. Limer E. Statistical analysis of non-experimental data. M: Nauka, 1983.-381 p.

77. Lobanov A., Fshin S., Chugunov A. Rizik management // Rizik. 1999. - No. 4. - P.43-52

78. Luhmann N. Understanding riziku // THESIS. 1994. - No. 5

79. Mayburd K.M. Introduction to the history of economic thought: from prophets to professors / Academician of National Economy of the Russian Federation. M.: Right Vi-ta-press, 1996. – 544 p.

80. McKinsey J. Introduction to the theory of igors/Trans. from English M.: Fizmatgiz, 1960.-407 p.

81. Marshall A. Principles of political economy/Trans. from English M: Progress, 1993.-281 p.

82. Materials of the International Conference // Risks of the Russian economy: analysis, assessment, management. -M.: 2003. No. 1 (14.10)

83. Materials of another international forum // Risk management in Russia -2004. M.: 2004. - No. 2 (2-4.11)

84. Mathematical encyclopedia. T. 1-5. -M: Radyanska encyclopedia, 1977-1985

85. Mathematical Encyclopedia, T.4. -M: Radyanska Encyclopedia, 1984. -589 p.

86. Management for an engineer / For the record. ed. E.S. Minaev. M: Good word, 1998.-521 p.

87. Meskon M.H., Albert M., Khedouri F. Fundamentals of management. M.: Right, 1992.-315 p.

88. Mill J. S. Fundamentals of political economics / Transl. from English for zag. ed. A.G. Mileykevsky, Yu.V. Kochevrin. M.: Progress, 1980. – 447 p.

89. Minaev E.S., Pesselova R.I., Badalova A.G. ta in. Recommendations for choosing and integrating forecasting methods. Mn.: BelNDINTI, 1989.-45 p.

90. Mitchell W. Economic cycles: The problem is the same. M., 1930.-503 p.

91. Modeling of risk situations in economics and business: Navch. Pos_bnik / A.M.Bubrov A.M., B.A.Lagosha, E.Yu.Khrustalov. T.P. Baranovska; Per ed. ~B.A.Lagosi. 2nd view, revised ta add. - M.: Finance and statistics, 2001.-224 p.

92. Moiseeva N.K., Aniskin Yu.P. Current entrepreneurship: competitiveness, marketing, renewal. Volume I, II-M.: Zovnishtorgvidav, 1993. - 526 p.121. Mordashov S.M. It is important to manage the company's property // Market of valuable papers. 2001. - No. 15.

93. Moskvin V.A. Fundamentals of the theory of the risk of implementation of investment projects//Investments in Russia. 2001. – No. 8. – pp. 33-37.

94. Mil'nik V.V., Titarenko B.P., Volochienko V.A. Further investigation of keruvanny systems. M.: Academic project, 2004. – 352 p.

95. Milnik V.V., Titarenko B.P., Volochienko V.A. Control systems. - M.: Academic project, 2002. 335 p.

96. Knight F. Understanding the essence and insignificance // THESIS. 1994. - No. 5.

97. Tidying up the rizik / Kevin Buhler, Gunnar Pritch // The McKinsey Quarterly, 2003 No. 4, pp. 15-25

98. Foreign economic theory (polytheconomy) / Ed. V.I.Vidyapina, G.P.Zhuravlyova. M.: PROMO-Media, 1995. – 608 p.

99. Zagalnorossiysk classifier of management documentation OK 01193. M: State Standard of Russia, 1995.

100. Ozhegov S.I. Dictionary of Russian. M.: Russian language, 1986. – 797 p.

101. Business assessment: Pidruchnik/Ed. A.G. Bryaznovy, M.A. Fedotova. -2nd type, processed. ta add. M.: Finance and statistics, 2004. – 736 p.

102. Assessing the risks of oil and gas projects / A.F. Andreev, V.D. Zubareva, V.G. Kurpitko, A.S. Sarkisov: Head. additional help. M.: GPU View "Nafta and Gas" RSU Nafta and Gas im. I.M.Gubkina, 2002. – 212 p.

103. Fundamentals of personnel management: Head. for universities / B.M.Genkin, G.A.Kononova, V.I.Kochetkov and in; Per ed. B.M. Genkina. M: Vishcha school. 1996.-383 p.

104. Oliynik K.A. Ecological risks of enterprise activities (nutrition methodology). M: View "Ankil", 2002. - 208 p.

105. Orlov A.I. Mathematics at a glance: Virtue and statistics, basic facts. – M.: MOZ-Press, 2004. – 110 p.

106. Orlov A.I. Resistance in socio-economic models. M: Nauka, 1979.-296 p.

107. Orlov A.I. Econometrics: Handy for cherries. 2nd view, revised ta add. -M.: Vidavnitstvo “Ispit”, 2003. – 576 p.

108. Paramonov F.I. Theoretical foundations of industrial management/F.I. Paramonov, Yu.M. Soldak. M: BINOM. Laboratory of knowledge, 2003.-280 p.

109. Pashchuk A. Tidying up the Risik // Secret of the Firm. 2005. – No. 26 (113). - P. 66-69141. Petrosov A.A., Mangush K.S. Economic risks of agricultural production: Basic handbook. M.: Branch of the Moscow State University, 2002. – 142 p.

110. Peseleva R.I., Badalova A.G., in. Forecasting technology, production organization and practice. M: VNIIPI, 1991.-168 z.

111. Pigu A. Economic theory of goodness/Trans. from English M: Progress, 1985.-301 p.

112. Putyatina L.M. Economics and finance of enterprise: Podruchnik/L.M. Putyatina, V.B. Batkivshchyna. M.: Economics and Finance, 2006. – 648 p.

113. Political economy: Handbook for universities. Medvedev V.A., Abalkin L.I., Ozherelev O.I. ta in M.: Politvidav, 1988. - 480 p.

114. Forecast of the development of the main fields and sectors of the world government for 2001-2015. M: RAS. Institute of World Economy and International Trade, 2001. – 133 p.

115. Robot book forecast / Ed. I.S. Bestuzheva-Ladi. -M: Dumka, 1982.-297 p.

116. Reznechenko V.Yu. Risk management: Head of teaching/Moscow State University of Economics, Statistics and Informatics. -M., 2004. - 100 p.

118. Risk analysis of an investment project: Head. for universities/Ed. M.V.Grachova. -M: UNITY-DANA, 2001. 351 p. 151. Rogov M.A. Rizik management. M.: Finance and statistics, 2001. - 120 p.

119. Redhead K., H'yus S. Management of financial risks / Transl. from English -M: INFRA-M, 1996. 288 p.

120. Samuelson P. Economics. - M: MDP "ALGON" VNIISI, 1992. T1. -335 s.

121. Sevruk V.T. Risks of the financial sector of the Russian Federation: A practical guide. -M: ZAT “Finstatinform”, 2001. 175 p.

122. Seligman B. Main currents of current economic thought. -M: Progress, 1968. 325 p.

123. Serdyukova I.D. Methods for analyzing financial risks // Accounting oblik. 1996. - No. 6. – pp. 54-57

124. Sidelnikov Yu.V., Tanasova A.S. Riks and model of situation selection // U zb. Collection of scientific works of the department “Virobnychiy management and marketing” MAI 2nd type. – M.: “Good Word”, 2004. – 472 p.

125. Sidelnikov Yu.V. Technology of expert forecasting: Basic handbook. - M: Good Word, 2004. 292 p.

126. Simcher V.M. Development of the Russian economy over 100 years: 1900–2000. Historical trends, secular trends, institutional cycles. M: Nauka, 2006.-587 p.

127. Scott Mark K. Factors of Varosti: Care for Managers from the Identification of Important Creation of Varosti/Trans. from English M: ZAT "Olymp-Business", 2000. - 432 p.

128. Smith A. Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. M: Nauka, 1992.-287 h.

129. Smirnov V.V. Insurance protection against risks during the sale of products under purchase and sale agreements on a delivery basis. M: Vidavnichy center "Ankil", 1997. - 232 p.

130. Current social theory: Bourdieu, Giddens, Habermas: Primary handbook. Novosibirsk: SB RAS, 1995. – 234 p.

131. Sokolov G.A., Gladkikh I.M. Mathematical statistics: Handbook for universities M: Vydavnitstvo “Ispit”, 2004. 432 p.

132. Solozhentsev E.D. Scenario-logical and logical risk management in business and technology.-SPb.: Vidavnichy house "Business Press", 2004.-432 p.

133. Stanislavchik E.H. Risk management for enterprise. Theory and practice. M.: Vis – 89, 2002. – 80 p.

134. Old D.E. Economy of the aviation industry. M.: Dobre Slovo, 2004. – 244 p.

135. Statistical methods analysis of safety of folding technical systems/Ed. V.P. Sokolova M.: Logos, 2001. – 230 p.

136. Surkov G. Kordoni Establishment of the Value-at-Risk methodology for assessing market risks: foreign evidence and Russian practice / Financier. 1999. - No. 9. – pp. 63-69

137. H. Turner D. Internationality, statistics, monitoring of operations / Transl. from English -M.: Vishch.shk., 1971. -376 p.

138. Tikhomirov N.P. Methods of analysis and management of environmental and economic risks, M: UNITI-DANA, 2003. 304 p.

139. Thompson A.A., Strickland A.J. Strategic management: concepts and situations for analysis/Trans. from English M.: William, 2005. - 928 p.

140. Tepman JI.H. Risks of Economics: Head. Handbook for universities/Ed. prof. V.A. Shvander. - M.: UNITI-DANA, 2002. 380 p.

141. William F. Sharp, Gordon J. Alexander, Jeffrey W. Bailey. Investments. M: Infra-M, 2001. 1027 p.

142. Walsh Do. Key indicators for management. M.: Right, 2000. - 285 p.

143. Sh.Utkin E.A., Frolov D.A. Management of business risks: Basic and practical. additional help. M.: TEIS, 2003. – 247 p.

144. Webster N. American Dictionary English language. 3rd type. -Stringfield: Merriam, 1961. – 1678 p.

145. Falko S.G. The concept of balanced management of internal operational risks of an enterprise // Controlling. 2004. No. 2.- P. 2-8

146. Fatkhutdinov P.A. Strategic marketing: handyman. M: ZAT “Business School “Intel-Sintez”, 2000. -640 p.

147. Filatova E.S. Socionics in portraits and butts. M.: Good word: Chorna bilka, 2006. – 368 p.

148. Fedulov A.A., Fedulov Yu.G., Tsigichko V.M. Introduction of the theory of statistically unreliable solutions. M.: Statistics, 1979. – 279 p.

149. Fomin G.P. Mathematical methods and models in commercial activity: Podruchnik. M.: Finance and statistics, 2001. – 544 p.

150. Khokhlov N.V. Risk management: Head. Handbook for universities. M.: UNITI-DANA, 2001.-239 p.

151. Tsai T.M., Graboviy P.G., Marashda Basam Sayel. Competition and risk management in enterprises in the minds of the market.-M.: Alan, 1997.-288 p.

152. Chase, Richard, B., Equiline, Nicholas, J., Jacobe, Robert, F. Virobnichy and operational management, 8th edition / Trans. from English M.: Vidavnichy house "Viliami", 2004. - 704 p.

153. Chernova G.V. The practice of risk management is on par with enterprise. -SPb.: Peter, 2000. 176 p.

154. Churkin E.M. Make business decisions based on modeling. -M: IVAKO-Analytik, 2000. 102 p.

155. Churkin E.M. Technology is a solution for management and business - M.: Good Word, 2003. 91 p.

156. Shakhov V.V., Medvedev V.G., Milerman A.S. Theory and risk management for insurance companies. M.: Finance and statistics, 2002. - 306 p. 191. Sheldrake J. Management theory under Taylorism before Japaneseization.-SPb: Peter, 2001.-328 p.

157. Shoshin P.B. Expand numbers as a description of subjective quantities / Statistical methods for analyzing expert estimates. -M: Nauka, 1977. P. 234-250.

158. Schumpeter I. ​​​Theory of economic development: Further investigation of income, capital, capital and the cycle of the situation / Transl. with him. V.S.Avtonomova and in. M.: Progress, 1982. – 455 p.

159. Economic theory/Ed. A.I. Dobrinina. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2001. -580 p.

160. Economics: English-Russian dictionary/editor/E.J. Dolan, B.I. Domnenko. M.: Lazur, 1994. – 544 p.

161. Encyclopedia of financial risk management/Ed. Lobanova A.A. and Chugunova A.V. M.: Alpina Publisher, 2003. – 786 p.

162. Lyag S. System management of organization/Trans. in English, ed. S.P. Nikanorova, S.A. Batasova. M.: “Radio Radio”, 1972. – 456 p.

163. Arthur Andersen. Operation Risk and Financial Institutions. - London: Risk Books, 1998. 198 p.

164. Banham R. Kit and Coboodle: Understanding the Skepticism o Enterprise Risk Management//CFO. 1999. – April. - P. 63-70

165. Cruz M.G. Modeling, Measuring and Hedging Operational Risk. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2002. - 356 p.203. Damodaran A. Investment Valuation. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002.-321 p.

166. Deloitte & Touche LLP. Views on Risk for Boards of Directors/Audit Committees, and Management. Wilton, CT: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu International, 1997. - 211 p.

167. Economist Intelligence Unit, written in cooperation with Arthur Andersen & Co. Management Business Risks An Integral Approach. - New York: The Economist Intelligence Unit, 1995. - 279 p.

168. Economist Intelligence Unit, written in cooperation with Arthur Andersen & Co. Managing Business Risks in the Information. New York: The Economist Intelligence Unit, 1998.-323 p.

169. Embrechts P. Extremes and Integrated Risk Management. - London: Risk Publication, 2000. 207 p.

170. Enterprise Risk Management Integrated Framework. - NY: Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, 2004. - 78 p.

171. Holton G.A. Value-at-Risk. Theory and Practice. Academic Press, 2003. -297 p.

172. Kervern G.-Y. Latest Advances in Cindynics. Paris: Economica, 1994.

173. Knight F.H. Risk, Uncertainty, Profit. - London, 1921.

174. Kloman H.F. Global Risk Management Standards and Definitions // Risk management report. - 2000. - N9. - P.7-9.

175. Operational Risk The Next Frontier / Risk Management Association. -Philadelphia: Association, 1999. - 215 p.

176. SAP BW Professional Bonn: Galileo Press, 2004. - 404 p.

177. Sing-Tze Bow. Pattern recognition and image preprocessing. Northern Illinois University, 2002. 234 p.

178. Thomas L. Barton, William G. Shenkir, Paul L. Walker. Making enterprise risk management pay off. Financial Executives Research Foundation, Inc., 2003.-215 p.

179. Tweeddale M. Managing risk and reliability of process plants. Burlington: Elsevier Science, 2003. 367 p.

180. Wiliams C.A.Jr., Heins R.M. Risk Management and Insurance. New York, 1985 -187p.219. mySAP FINANCIALS. SAP AG, 2003. www.sap.com

181. SAP Strategic Enterprise Management. SAP AG, 2000. www.sap.com

182. SAS OpRisk Management. SAS Institute Inc, 2003. www.sas.com

183. SAS Risk Dimensions. SAS Institute Inc, 2003. www.sas.com