Stalin - The people who created capitalism. Kaplan Read Capitalism, Stalin - Lyudina, who instigated capitalism. Kaplan Capitalism is a painless read, Stalin - Lyudina, who instilled capitalism. Lewis E. Kaplan Capitalism read online. Versions of the legend, St.

Lewis E. Kaplan

Lyudina, who betrayed capitalism

Enter

My friend Caroline, without such joyful and important participation in the creation of this book, it would have been impossible

At the turn of the century, capitalism created its first marvel of the 20th century, the multibillion-dollar corporation United States Steel. And today, thanks to the efforts of the American banker J.P. Morgan and the necessary support of the steel industry magnate Andrew Carnegie, America is losing its leading capitalist power in the world. Sales obligations of the United States Steel corporation today exceed the US government budget deficit in 1900. Even with little luck, billions of dollars became just a mental sum in which the arrogant “black” world of the American businessman could survive. And today the assets of the company of Bill Gates, one of the founders of Microsoft, are estimated at less than 50 billion dollars. At the moment, there are more than 300 dollar billionaires, according to Forbes magazine (as of 2007, there are about 900 people around the world, according to the same data. Note Prov.). According to data from the leading company TNS, the number of “households” with an income of over 1 million dollars moves 8 million to the United States, without regulating the value of their private living quarters.

Let us add these figures to the states of the European riches, which grew fat on the naphtha flows of the Arab sheikhs of the Persian inlet, and to the holdings of the Russian oligarchs, who took their wealth from the inheritance of "vatization" of Radyansky's colossal lane to the Union, then the sum will be small. The stars have arrived at this incredible wealth, which is calculated in tens of trillions of dollars? Perhaps some spirit from Aladdin’s enchanting lamp came to mind? For the hell of it, could only people create such hostile capital?

Those who take the title of this book as showing irony should not hesitate to counteract such basements and so on. No. This book is written about people who once changed the forms of capitalism and the methods of their implementation, which, in its turn, led to incredible and unprecedented prosperity in the United States and parts of the world.

If you allow something like a stew, you put collective wisdom and a healthy heart under nutrition. However, let us repeat once again: the collective mind is still so strong that it cannot be overcome. Well, in conclusion, the story is a summary of a bunch of different ideas, some innocently re-arranged, some absent, but rather similar to the necessary order in which they have been placed, and it is understandable that And it happened. Keeping in mind not to become particularly difficult, the fragments in historians and physical data (depending not only on documentary, archaeological research, but also on the radiocarbon method of identifying objects and geo Logo-chemical studies of the versatility of cultural breeds). Note Prov.). No, the very interpretation of the data is often the reason for the pardons of historians. Unfortunately, objectivity is wasted, so that in order to overcome the decision, one puts down the sword and takes up, apparently mentally, the pen.

Today, Josip Stalin is described as a dictator who ruled the Radyansky Union with a slimy hand for the sake of his own agenda - the guilt of a socialist state under the control (and at least for the sake of it) of any proletariat. In fact, there was an attempt by the ruling clique, as Stalin rejected, to create a new partnership, in which the concept of “economic justice” would override the significance of what is called morality in the Sunset.

This is a fundamental part of Marxism. In place of the vicarious fruits of the rich, the rich are transferred to their (fruits) division for justice among the ears in order to achieve the ultimate goodness of the people. This was the attempt of Karl Marx and others to cross the current of the European romantic movement at the turn of the 18th–19th centuries, to direct it into the mainstream of philosophical understanding (to provide a basis for it). This was the war cry of the French revolution, with its famous cry of “freedom, jealousy, fraternity”, which gave the shell of German deterministic philosophy.

This sounded quite romantic and insignificant, in order to win over a small part of the current intelligentsia, which had adopted Marx’s (messianic, in essence) call for social (and economic) justice. This screamed at the bourgeoisie at that time, and this new prophet of the Old Testament predicted the inevitability of such a revolution in life.

This is not a book about Marx, who is still revered as an authoritative figure in many academic schools today. No, this book is written about Stalin, about his look at the Radyansky Union and the world of capitalism, in particular, this experiment was carried out in the creation of a “socialist” partnership. There is no re-examination here to criticize or justify his actions, the book has made an attempt to evaluate these people’s actions from the singer’s perspective. If you marvel at Stalin with such a rank, you can understand why, even after the end of his death, an unforgettable victory in the current marriage has been preserved - let alone often and erased by an ungrateful hour - we ice of his activity. Having exhausted the wrath of people, they wereted away from Russia from the inhabited land, and the people of the earth were brought from the ruins. In contrast to Marx, who at once seemed to be more of a theorist and simply looked at the light of speeches, Stalin was a pragmatist. It has created something that has not been done before - a vibrant socialist power.

Marx argued that the proletariat’s rise to political power was imminent, and Stalin realized that only force could produce the desired results. The bitter and often cynical look at speech was perceived by the outside world as barbarism unleashed. In Stalin's opinion, violence was necessary for the socialist economy to reach its full potential. Before the proletariat realizes the fate destined for them, there will be no time, no time to worry. As we then miss with the writer John Gunter, “a million deaths are statistics. One death is a tragedy.”

In the minds of those at Zakhod, who were sharply critical of Stalin, and those who managed to live in the minds of the Radyan system, having created a whole people, their morality was absolutely attenuated. No one wants to accept the idea that this was the creation of a new breed of people, freed from “selfishness”, who will gradually learn to satisfy their desires and especially the suspiciousness of the musculoskeletal cortex. . This is how Marx himself described the people of the future in his works, and Stalin believed it to be true of reality.

The oldest teacher and methodologist Isaac Erukhimovich Kaplan was the author of “Literature” since 1994, and I will leave my article about the legendary story of Kostyantin Simonov “Wait for me, and I will return...” published here in the spring of 2004, shortly before his death. Those other articles that went up to this, unfortunately, posthumous book, also appeared in “Literature” for the first time - so that they were forwarded by the author to his colleagues for safe verification of them.

Burnt collection І.Є. Kaplan, we first emphasize the relevance of this topic. For example, for example, about the graduation from literature... The peculiarities of its implementation today are constantly being discussed by both students and readers. What forms of control are children prepared for? How should I develop?

There is also one type of work that a graduate will encounter at any time: either he gives literature in the form of EDI or he writes. Let's talk about the analysis of poetic text. If any wordsmith comes in handy, this is one of the most complex forms of analysis that a student can learn.

Helpful lyrics for current teenagers, trapped in the fog of pop pop, are usually deprived of a pole of inaccessibility. On the other hand, the fabric of the poetic text is so thin and exudes such great care that the analysis of the text often ruins those for which the poetry was born. Even for children in hospital, self-esteem and assessment of the world are required!

The axis of this search for effective, effective forms is to begin reading, understanding and measuring the completed work of the book I.Є. Kaplan can give me some additional help.

We know: there are a lot of assistants who help the wordsmith with his difficult task. But mainly it is necessary to place literary material: to clarify the peculiarities of poetic language, to look at the developed dimensions, to analyze creative features. The reader, of course, cannot do without this material. It is also possible to learn the rules of the road and the handling of the car over and over again, but still not master the handling of the car. Philology is much more complicated.

From his great experience of pedagogical knowledge, I.I. Kaplan is deprived of the tried and tested method: the beginning of the analysis of the image. Vin presents his reader with thoughtful analyzes of poetic works included in the high school curriculum. The only names of the authors are: Pushkin, Lermontov, Tyutchev, Nekrasov, Fet, Blok, Mayakovsky, Yesenin, Pasternak, Zabolotsky, Simonov, Tvardovsky.

I.Є. Kaplan reveals the methods of analysis that can be used to attract the respect of high school students to the boundless possibilities of the word, to teach the profound purpose of the artistic structure of the verse, to help the stressed uniqueness of the look of the singer on the stage, of people and light. At the same time, the author does not impose on the reader his point of view on the top as the only possible path of his learning. He admits that the creative reader will make his corrections to the analysis of Wikonian and obtain additional material.

The cream of the analytical part intended for the teacher, skin analysis, contains nutrition and food for students. It is especially important to note that the stinks duplicate the work of the assistants, and the purpose of specially molded work is with poetic text.

We especially call upon the Addendum before collecting the lessons and guesses of the participants about these poets, whose works became the subject of analysis. “The reader’s return to memoirs, sheets of artists’ words, forever and ever,” writes I.Є. Kaplan. “The authenticity of the stench even flows onto students, resurrects a distant era, and helps to understand the writer as a people, which is a lot to explain in his works.”

Also a short list of top and methodical literature that completes the book. It has more than twenty positions, and the folding of the table is thought out, so again one cannot help but notice behind these rows the great professional testimony of the author, whose quality is recommended.

And, you will decide, if you want the author of this insurance to cover the teacher-literature teacher, as if it were a good book, with his own place and the knowledge of his daily life, he significantly expands the reader’s address and will become a great help during the hour of preparation studies of abstracts, to provide the applicant with material for his independent preparation before testing.

The mystery of Fanny Kaplan has not yet been solved. Vaughn went down in history as the woman who shot at. This image in mass culture for the Radian rocks was very negative. And since 1991, investigators have tried to date an unforeseen test of assessing the characteristics of terrorists.

Childhood and youth

After the collapse of the USSR, the descendants were given access to part of the archives, after which the biography of a woman who made a move against the “leader” became public. However, the reliability of the data is questionable. The information was also removed from Kaplan herself. What is said below is true, and what is nonsense is unknown. It’s easy to doubt one thing: the share of the 28-year-old woman who tried to assassinate the Bolshevik leader was terrible.

The real name of the woman who shot for the “leader” is Feiga Rotblat. The future revolutionary was born into the family of a Jewish teacher. Feiga has three sisters and brothers. All children received home lighting. It’s difficult to say what drove the girl to terrorist activity. At the turn of the century, aggressive revolutionary ideas became fashionable, favored by hobby lovers and high school students alike.

At 16 rocks, Feiga joined the revolutionaries. Then she won the underground title, for which she became famous. The first arrest fell on the beginning of the revolutionary road. In the hotel room, the girl was preparing a bomb, as she had done earlier. The terrorist, who did not get off, was harassed. Just before the hour, she suffered serious injuries, after which she began to fall sharply.

Well, Kaplan was first arrested near Kiev in 1906. For preparing for a terrorist act, the stratum was threatened. After the miscreants' retirement, the stratum was replaced with eternal penal servitude. In 1917 The flights have been called in. That includes Kaplan.

The convict woman lived with Chita for three months. Then I went to Moscow. Due to the fate of her marriage, Fanny began to have friends. The young revolutionary's lightning splendidly sprang from Maria Spiridonova. Since at first Kaplan was a full-fledged anarchist, in 1917 the Socialist Revolutionary Party arrived in the capital.

Kaplan came to Moscow with Anna Pigit, a 34-year-old revolutionary, who took her part in the battle against the remaining Russian Tsar. The women moved into a small house on Velikaya Sadovaya, the same one where the characters had been hanging around earlier. The Eserivka lived here for a month. Then I went to Evpatoria.

Revolution

In 1917, fate fell into order. After all the months, news about the death of the king spread around the world. The Romanovs were shot near Yekaterinburg. The bodies were burned. The Bolsheviks used the same method of reducing traces of evil later, after the execution of Kaplan.

There were three parties in the country, waging a heated struggle one after another. From now on, the Eseri and the Bolsheviks are united, and I’m going to go ahead and save the old regime. Later the Socialists were divided into rightists and leftists. The leader of the rest was Spiridonova, who brought the anarchist Kaplan into the hands of hard labor. At the time of the low uprising, the Bolsheviks were able to overcome other and great troubled ones.

Swing at Lenin

This became 30 sickles. The leader of the Bolsheviks attacked the Mikhelson plant. Here on the new bank there was an Eserivka with Browning. Having treated Ulyanov, Rotblat fired three shots. Lenin recovered from his wounds and was left alive. Before the speech, it’s not the first and the last swing. Even the days of that bitter day and today preserve much of the darkness. Adje Kaplan and after staying at the sanatorium did not see any news. How did the blind woman manage to reach her victim?

After I swing, the shooter will be carefully trimmed and brought to Lubyanka. Yakov Peters will finish it. Zatrimana reports that she arrived at the plant in the eighth year of the morning. There was no revolver for her. Whom she took away later, they say they are convinced. Kaplan insists that she did not have any sleepovers and did not do any special work. Zlochynets repeats the words “I don’t want to talk,” “I don’t know.” Behave from the side. The investigator will try to remember that God is in front of him.

The next day, Kaplan meets with his enemy of the Yellow Revolution. The fierce one decided to shoot at Lenin. Fanny was in charge of a confrontation with Robert Lockhart, a British diplomat known as a spy. In his book of conjectures, Kaplan described it this way:

"An unprepossessing woman with a barbarous appearance."

The photographs were preserved, collected after the swing. This is how Feiga looked in her youth, you can let it go any further. The film “Lenin in 1918” shows an unpleasant, year-old woman with a terrible grin. The mass culture of the Radyan rocks deprives such an image of Kaplan of the right to exist.

Fanny did not need more food. Peters asked about partyism, political views. Kaplan hummed. The investigator was unable to connect the woman with any terrorist organization. When asked why she shot at Ulyanov, she confirmed:

"We welcomed the Revolution."

Peters was unable to bring Feiga Rotblat's honor to the collapse of the Socialists. There was more neglect, as later, two days after the shooting, Kaplan started learning English from his friend. Still, Feiga gave birth to the investigator. The protocol has kept records that characterize the miscreant.

Special life

At Evpatoria, Kaplan met the zemstvo doctor, a close relative of her future victim. From Dmitry Ulyanov. Feiga arrived at the sanatorium for a voucher, obtained from the professional corps of revolutionaries. There is a version that Rotblat began a short-hour affair here.

Ten years spent in prison, signs were given. Fanny's eyes are no less captivating. The revolutionary suffered from tuberculosis, as she suffered from a lot of serious illnesses. Being pretty in her youth, until the age of 28 she turned into a middle-aged, ill woman.

Dmitro Illich served as a doctor at the sanatorium. Having lost her respect for Fanny, which had been ruined by excessive gain, she was clearly mocked by the emancipated short-haired revolutionaries. Ale novel from Ulyanov calls for complete disappointment.

Prote love affair with Lenin's brother is a sham. I will finish the protocol, which was published by Peters in the spring of 1918. There have been 20 stories of obscurity.

In 1906, a girl was preparing a bomb, which was assigned to Governor Sukhomlinov, for which she was sent to hard labor. Of course, she was not alone that day. Spilnik – Viktor Garsky – has left the place of evil.

Yuna Kaplan took the offense. Chi has not seen the huge man. After being released, Garsky suddenly fell ill. This sustrich did not reassure the anarchist. The exalted woman with the convict's prison babbled. Prote you through the night with a lot of dough, and then throw it away. Kaplan told Peters this story with its complicated ending during the last drink.

Death

3rd Veresny, with the order to shoot the spy in the dark. Peters was amazed that he wanted to know the deputy. Alya had a chance to vikonuvati the order. The role of the cat was played by a fanatical sailor who served as the commandant of the Kremlin during the rocks of the revolution. The body was placed in a barrel and burned.

That day the Cheka was killed in Petrograd. The “watering on the street” has begun. Death targeted the priests, the “white” officers, the Socialists. Over the course of five years, the Bolsheviks have lost many opponents and those who exhibited dissent. And at the place where I swung through the rocks, they erected a great monument to Kaplan’s sacrifice.

Є submissiveness: Rotblat implemented the plan of the Tsar of Reds. That’s what Sverdlov was called, because Lenin’s death meant a return to power. It is certain that the evildoer was hastily punished, and her body was found on the spot, out of sight of the Kremlin.

Memory

• 1939 – “Lenin in 1918”
• 2015 – “Fanny Kaplan” (documentary film from the series “Russia at the Fire”)
• 2016 – “My grandmother Fanny Kaplan”
• 2017 – “Swings at the Leader” (release of the documentary series “Riddles of the Age”)

Stalin - The people who created capitalism. Lewis E. Kaplan

What a book you got from the catless electronic library http://filosoff.org/ Happy reading! Stalin - The people who created capitalism. Lewis E. Kaplan Intro. My friend Caroline, without the pleasure and important participation in the creation of this book, it would have been impossible. At the turn of the century, capitalism created its first marvel of the 20th century, the multibillion-dollar corporation United States Steel. And today, thanks to the efforts of the American banker J.P. Morgan and the necessary support of the steel industry magnate Andrew Carnegie, America is losing its leading capitalist power in the world. Sales obligations of the United States Steel corporation today exceed the US government budget deficit in 1900. Even with little luck, billions of dollars became just a mental sum in which the arrogant “black” world of the American businessman could survive. And today the assets of the company of Bill Gates, one of the founders of Microsoft, are estimated at less than 50 billion dollars. At the moment, there are more than 300 dollar billionaires, according to Forbes magazine (as of 2007, there are close to 900 people around the world, according to the same person. - Note per.). According to data from the leading company TNS, the number of “households” with an income of over 1 million dollars moves 8 million to the United States, without regulating the value of their private living quarters. Let us add these figures to the states of the European riches, which grew fat on the naphtha flows of the Arab sheikhs of the Persian inlet, and to the holdings of the Russian oligarchs, who took their wealth from the inheritance of "vatization" of Radyansky's colossal lane to the Union, then the sum will be small. The stars have arrived at this incredible wealth, which is calculated in tens of trillions of dollars? Perhaps some spirit from Aladdin’s enchanting lamp came to mind? For the hell of it, could only people create such hostile capital? Those who take the title of this book as showing irony should not hesitate to counteract such basements and so on. No. This book is written about people who once changed the forms of capitalism and the methods of their implementation, which, in its turn, led to incredible and unprecedented prosperity in the United States and parts of the world. If you allow something like a stew, you put collective wisdom and a healthy heart under nutrition. However, let us repeat once again: the collective mind is still so strong that it cannot be overcome. Well, in conclusion, the story is a summary of a bunch of different ideas, some innocently re-arranged, some absent, but rather similar to the necessary order in which they have been placed, and it is understandable that And it happened. It is difficult to follow the past steps, the fragments in historians and physical data (they are respected not only by documentary, archaeological research, but also by the radiocarbon method of identifying objects and geological chemistry extensive research into the cultural traditions - Note by Prov.). No, the very interpretation of the data is often the reason for the pardons of historians. Unfortunately, objectivity is wasted, so that in order to overcome the decision, one puts down the sword and takes up, apparently mentally, the pen. Today, Josip Stalin is described as a dictator who ruled the Radyansky Union with a slimy hand for the sake of his own agenda - the guilt of a socialist state under the control (and at least for the sake of it) of any proletariat. In fact, there was an attempt by the ruling clique, as Stalin rejected, to create a new partnership, in which the concept of “economic justice” would override the significance of what is called morality in the Sunset. This is a fundamental part of Marxism. In place of the vicarious fruits of the rich, the rich are transferred to their (fruits) division for justice among the ears in order to achieve the ultimate goodness of the people. This was the attempt of Karl Marx and others to cross the current of the European romantic movement at the turn of the 18th–19th centuries, to direct it into the mainstream of philosophical understanding (to provide a basis for it). This was the war cry of the French revolution, with its famous cry of “freedom, jealousy, fraternity”, which gave the shell of German deterministic philosophy. This sounded quite romantic and insignificant, in order to win over a small part of the current intelligentsia, which had adopted Marx’s (messianic, in essence) call for social (and economic) justice. This screamed at the bourgeoisie at that time, and this new prophet of the Old Testament predicted the inevitability of such a revolution in life. This is not a book about Marx, who is still revered as an authoritative figure in many academic schools today. No, this book is written about Stalin, about his look at the Radyansky Union and the world of capitalism, in particular, this experiment was carried out in the creation of a “socialist” partnership. There is no re-examination here to criticize or justify his actions, the book has made an attempt to evaluate these people’s actions from the singer’s perspective. If you marvel at Stalin with such a rank, you can understand why, even after the end of his death, an unforgettable victory in the current marriage has been preserved - let alone often and erased by an ungrateful hour - we ice of his activity. Having exhausted the wrath of people, they wereted away from Russia from the inhabited land, and the people of the earth were brought from the ruins. In contrast to Marx, who at once seemed to be more of a theorist and simply looked at the light of speeches, Stalin was a pragmatist. It has created something that has not been done before - a vibrant socialist power. Marx argued that the proletariat’s rise to political power was imminent, and Stalin realized that only force could produce the desired results. The bitter and often cynical look at speech was perceived by the outside world as barbarism unleashed. In Stalin's opinion, violence was necessary for the socialist economy to reach its full potential. Before the proletariat realizes the fate destined for them, there will be no time, no time to worry. As we then miss with the writer John Gunter, “a million deaths are statistics. One death is a tragedy.” In the minds of those at Zakhod, who were sharply critical of Stalin, and those who managed to live in the minds of the Radyan system, having created a whole people, their morality was absolutely attenuated. No one wants to accept the idea that this was the creation of a new breed of people, freed from “selfishness”, who will gradually learn to satisfy their desires and especially the suspiciousness of the musculoskeletal cortex. . This is how Marx himself described the people of the future in his works, and Stalin believed it to be true of reality. Having become, after the death of Lenin, one of the only dead Bolsheviks, who, having lost, can bring harmony to the chaos that is in pandemonium. The Russian Empire, which the Bolsheviks now ruled, united all kinds of peoples, different cultures, religions, languages, etc. And I remember that only I was destined to enter into these incredibly complex tasks, since I was well aware of this multiplicity, this diversity of the culture of the region. As soon as the great experiment of the created socialist power is completed due to this unfortunate fall, which was lost to the tsarist regime, which has rotted, then the most important forces in the camp will unite these divisions and, at times, the enemies of the nation great Russia, however, we will be allowed to preserve the most important elements of our national identity. Stalin was a nationalist Georgian and miraculously knew about the sub-central forces that could dissolve the Radyansky Union before he could create the basis for development. Great people are asking for something that I can hand over to them “on a silver platter.” It’s not good to have mercy - if historians of fates talk about it in a hundred and twenty years, Stalin might be called the most important politician of his time. Until today, if the mighty empire appeared to be thrown into the graveyard of history, then Stalin will be judged especially for the incredible cruelties during the hours of his rule - in relation to the citizens of the SRSR and the country's ally iv. This wealth is buried under the same ball of the historical saw. In just about fifteen years, starting from the other quarter of the 20th century, a powerful industrial empire was created. Cat-free lighting has become available in remote areas of the great territory of the region. Cost-free medical assistance also became available to all citizens. And the cost of illumination not only did not require payment, but was based on the payment of scholarships to students. Nareshti, every human being has the right to be guaranteed a job. In such a short time, the Axis, one of the most distant countries of Europe, had a chance to become a modern power. The Moscow metro, in honor of 1936, was the world's greatest. Rowing from hydroelectric power stations provided millions of people with electricity. To perform such a “feat of Hercules” in a short hour - oh, for which a lot of discipline was needed. And those who only tried to repair the operation of this system were disturbed. You could have said: “You can’t start a revolution in seamed mittens.” So, then there was the death of millions of so-called “kulaks” in Ukraine, who opposed the current state program of collectivization of their private states. The Radian state had all power in order. Marx, in his romantic vision of socialism, could call the proletariat the ruling class. But the Radyansky Union was ruled by Stalin and those whose minds were unique in their purity. And here is the Achilles heel of every rogue leader who inspires fear. While it is alive, it can be repaired as we take care of the needs, without losing respect for the possible power from its drive. If a wine, which does not tolerate the thirsty opposition during the period of government, fills the scene, a vacuum is created there, which is practically impossible to fill. Having crushed all opposition to his regime, Stalin deprived himself of followers, rather than leaders, and they appeared unable to think independently. The Politburo was a kind of “one-man show,” a one-man show. It is not easy for an outsider to understand her status. And he was not a human being, but a human God. Literally, almost nothing, we won the current state. Thus, he earned money for the help of mass slander and gluttony. Ale mіts of his power allowed the Radian Union after Another World War to become another powerful power on the earth's core. The Politburo's skin was damaged by its recessions, and was assessed as equal to this, as if Stalin had been subjected to similar situations. In the end, he lost his entire living primara. Khrushchev was once in control of the members of the Politburo through those who they respected, even though he was capable of “voluntarism,” shouting to the United States during the Cuban Missile Crisis. They did not care that the United States was hesitant about the idea of ​​withdrawing its missiles from Turkey as an equal exchange of quid pro quo. Ale Stalin never made any direct attacks against the United States in the current war (the entire Western War, consistent with the Monroe Doctrine, was already in the other half of the 19th century surrounded by the zone of strategic interests of the United States. - Note .trans.). Stalin always put down all sorts of substitutes, as he wanted to resist the colossus of America. Approaching the Cold War, the foundations of Stalin back in the 1950s, mummified, mute at the hour capsule. In response to the Chinese strategist Deng Xiaoping, who immediately recognized the limited possibilities of the socialist economy, Stalin's followers pushed the course until the end, until the regime entered. The principle of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” explains the essence of the unjust alliance between the Radian Union, the United States and Britain, which is at the time of Another World War. At that time, it was necessary to introduce ideology. Those terrible days of 1943 doomed, since the share of Europe lay, it seems, within the capabilities of the Radian army)